Answer:
i think it's lessons involving introduction of one new letter
Brain the word that should be in bold is “random”.
that being the case, the correct answer is d) an adjective.
in the part of the speech that says “the survey seems random but the results are invalid because the participants were screened”, the word in bold is an adjective.
in grammatics, an adjective is a word that modifies a noun. the adjective modifies or decribes a noun adding characteristics to it regarding size, weight, color, shape, material, or age. in this case, the adjective “random” is modifying the noun “survey.”
<u><em>AKA THE ANSWER IS [ D ]</em></u>
Answer:
"In the first frantic greetings lavished on himself as a noted
sufferer under the overthrown system"
"But should, for his sake, be held blameless in safe custody"
Explanation:
The two details in the text that reveals to the reader that Doctor Manette has a good reputation with members of the Tribunal are first the frantic greetings that was given to him and then the suggestion that for the sake of Doctor Manette, he should be held blameless in safe custody.
Answer:
1. The Civil Rights Movement of February 1, 1960.- Supporting Argument
2. The case of a bone marrow donor for the Silicon Valley worker.- Counterargument
Explanation:
The author Malcolm Gladwell used the case of the sit-in by the four students in a white restaurant on February 1, 1960, to support his argument that close ties are very essential to high-risk activism. He believed that knowing friends on a personal level who supported the same course increased the chances of participating and persevering in acts of protests that could be life-threatening. For him, this level of success cannot be ensured by social media.
A counter-argument was when a Silicon Valley worker came down with leukemia that required a bone marrow transplant. It was impossible to get the donor through close relatives but only succeeded through a social media platform when the message was circulated among many people. The author countered the success of social media in this regard by saying that the intent was to have a sense of accomplishment and to receive praise. It did not involve a financial or personal risk.
This question is incomplete because you are missing part of it; here is the complete question:
Indicate the appropriateness of the subject for a four- to six-page research paper by answering the following question.
Is the following topic suitable for a research paper? Why or why not? how a cheetah eats its food
A. No, it is too broad.
B. No, it is too narrow.
C. Yes, it is broad enough.
D. Yes, it is narrow enough.
The answer to this question is B. No, it is too narrow
Explanation:
In a research paper, especially in one of four to six pages, you are required to provide multiple ideas from different sources to explain the main topic. This implies the topic is appropriate only if it requires the author to give many details or can develop it in 4 to 6 pages. This does not occur if you write about "how a cheetah eats its food" because it is likely cheetahs have only one or few ways to eat their food, and therefore this topic does not require multiple details. According to this, the topic is not suitable because it requires few details or ideas, thus, the reason that makes it inappropriate is that is too narrow.
