Answer:
pretty sure its c
and if you can, can u please answer my english questionnnn
Explanation:
Answer:
A conclusion that is in favour:
"Using public money to maintain national landmarks is a good policy in the sense that a national landmark is a public good: no one can be excluded from enjoying the view of a national landmark like the Arch in St. Louis for example.
Because they are public goods, national landmarks are not likely to be profitable or provided by the private sector in a free market, and for this reason, government intervention in the form of public money becomes necessary".
Answer:
c. compound
Explanation:
This is a compound sentence, you can easily get that by seeing that it contains a conjunction, but. Conjunctions include, for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so. You can remember it with the acronym, FANBOYS. Also, the sentence has two independent clauses, or two parts that could stand as a sentence by itself, opponents of labeling defend GMOs, proponents are skeptical.
It was hard to ride.
It was very heavy
it had design flaws
Answer:
The options are
Both include information that ask people to help children from Central America.
Both offer solutions that show how victims from other countries have been helped.
The excerpt from Enrique's Journey uses quotations to show that it is better for these children to be sent back, and "Children of the Drug Wars" uses examples describing how other countries have dealt with the issue.
The excerpt from Enrique's Journey tells a story about what happened to one victim, and "Children of the Drug Wars" uses words that create an emotional response to persuade readers to take action.
The answer is The excerpt from Enrique's Journey helps tells a story about what happened to one victim, and "Children of the Drug Wars" uses words that create an emotional response to persuade readers to take action.
