The use of detailed descriptions is a common feature of epic poetry like The Rámáyan of Válmíki. Option A is correct.
An epic poem is a long, narrative poem that usually deals with heroic deeds and events or situations that are of paramount importance to the culture of the poet. Several ancient writers used epic poetry to tell tales of intense adventures and heroic feats.
An epic poem ordinarily involves a time beyond living memory in which the extraordinary doings of the extraordinary men and women occured.
I’m pretty sure it’s also referred to as a soft crab
verifiable facts that explain why social media's impact was so broad during the uprisings
statistics that describe Egyptians' use of the internet and social media during the uprisings
There is definitely end rhyme in this
A foil is the near complete opposite of the main character (whichever character they want you to find a foil for).
Rainsford and Whitney were good hunting friends with numerous similar interests. They could not be foils because of how close in similarity they were. Even when they disagreed on how animals felt about being hunted, Whitney seemed open to and intrigued by Rainsford's points and way of thinking.
Ivan is a near irrelevant character, being a mere Cossack who follows whatever General Zaroff says. He is mindless and has almost zero traits to even compare to Rainsford, let alone any traits aside from a mindless follower to begin with.
The answer would be General Zaroff. This is almost like the cliche protagonist vs antagonist foil. Both of them are hunters, but different kinds. Zaroff got bored with animals and wanted to hunt human people instead, whereas Rainsford had enjoyed the thrill of an animal hunt and thinks that the hunting of people is murder. Zaroff is more heartless and cold, a killer, if you will. Rainsford seems to think highly of actual people, and had no interest in playing Zaroff's game.
