Answer:
The correct answer is c) a chemical change, because a gas was produced.
Explanation:
Sometimes when performing scientific experiments in laboratories, chemical changes are obtained in the elements that have been used, a chemical change is an alteration in the structure of a compound, so the element is different than at the beginning of the experiment.
Generally, when there is a chemical change this is usually irreversible; For example, in the case of Nio, he experiments with yeast, water, and sugar, which puts it in a bottle and closes it with a balloon, this mixture of substances has resulted in a chemical change since the element is transformed in gas.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
Sorry but the correct answer is The Minnesota Study found that identical twins were less similar in personality than fraternal twins.
Explanation:
The correct answer is george's insistence that there are five economic characteristics of land, and they demand, situs, scarcity, transferability, and utility
Answer:
Cognitive psychology
Explanation:
Cognitive psychology covers not only intelligence and poblem solving but also perception, attention, memory, knowledge, reasoning, decision-making and language. It basically covers all related to thinking and therefore can explain functions that behaviorists cannot since behavioism is only concerned with the behavior that can be observed.
Answer: the contestants and observers thought the questioners were more knowledgeable than the contestants.
Explanation: Ross et al published a paper in the journal of personality and social psychology in 1977 titled
"Social Roles, Social Control, and Biases in Social-Perception Processes". They demonstrated that our actions and perceptions are determined by roles we have to play in interpersonal encounters; this is the biasing effect social roles have on performance.
In this instance the observers and the contestants perceived the questioners as having superior knowledge as the questioners were given latitude in how they frame the questions. Due to their social roles, the questioners were "the powerful" while the contestants and observers were "the powerless" playing out their roles and not taking into account the biasing effect.
If the roles were switched around, the outcome would still be the same with each group irrespective of their actual ability and knowledge.
