With the help of inductive reasoning, he reached the conclusion that segregation laws are all unjust.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the three part deductive statement, the major premise was all the laws that degrade the human personality are unjust. The minor premise was segregation laws degrade the human personality and therefore the conclusion was that the segregation laws are unjust.
This conclusion has been derived from the evidences like the hate filled policemen kick brothers and sisters. African American caught in an airtight prison of poverty. They were excluded from amusement parks. All this degraded the human personality and were unjust.
- 1 Clause
- 1 Clause
- 2 Clauses
- 2 Clauses
- 1 Clause
<h3>*THEY ARE IN NUMBER ORDER I JUST DIDN'T USE THE NUMBERS TO CONFUSE YOU*</h3>
Answer:
To provide the Wellcomb family's backstory
Explanation:
The passage is just giving a short paragraph of what went on in their life. ( A Back story )
Answer:
To describe the most important ideas in Swift’s essay and explain his reason for writing.
Explanation:
This is the statement that best describes Swift's purpose for writing the essay "A Modest Proposal." In this text, Swift uses satire to describe a revolutionary, but most likely un popular idea: the fact that rich English people should buy poor Irish children in order to eat them. Swift argues that this will reduce the problem of poverty in Ireland. However, the text is a satire intended to criticize the way in which Irish people were abused by the English government.