Answer:
No she won't.
Explanation:
Vicki will not be able to present evidence as to the sales representative's statements concerning the warranty that "This writing is the full and final expression of the parties' agreement; anything said before signing or while signing is irrelevant." thereby excluding the car's warranty.
Hence, any evidence of the discussion of the warranty would most likely be excluded by the parol evidence rule.
Answer:
The impact of spending $50,000 on the research and development for a new drug to to cure liver damage will increase the expenses of the Morgan Pharmaceutical in the years financial statements.
Explanation:
Morgan pharmaceutical is pending $50,000 on he research and development of new drug which can cure the liver damage, from this spending company is expecting that after they have successfully created new drug it will lead to the increase in sales , which will ultimately lead to increase in profits , which then would totally recover the initial cost incurred on research and development but until then these expenses would be shown in the current years financial statement as expenses, and thus would increase the total expenses of the company.
Answer:
The question is missing stock quotes which are found in the attached.
The maximum price that Norman Pilbarra will pay to buy 400 shares is $103.8 per share.
Explanation:
Judging from the attached stock quotes,the first 200 shares offered for sale is $103.5 per share while the next 200 shares is at a price of $103.8.
This then means that the maximum price for 200 shares is $103.8.This information is derived from the ask prices not bid prices since ask price is for sale,whereas bid is for purchase.
Answer:
Which of the following statements about brand names is true?
- 1. Brand names give the seller an incentive to provide consistently high-quality products and services in order to protect the reputation of the brand.
Options 2 and 3 are wrong:
2. Brand names are always economically wasteful since they dupe consumers into buying more expensive goods and services that are no different from generic versions.
⇒ FALSE, just because a product has a certain brand it doesn't make it better and therefore more expensive. There are brands that consumers associate with luxury and expensive products, while there are other brands that consumers recognize while not necessarily being more expensive than others, e.g Coke.
3. It is always rational to prefer brand names over generic substitutes.
⇒ FALSE, it depends on the type of product. Generic medicines as just as effective as banded medicines.
Read the following example and determine whether it illustrates a common critique or defense of advertising.
- This illustrates a common <u>CRITIQUE</u> of advertising. This ad targets young people that are susceptible to believing exaggerated or materialistic aspects of a product that cannot be proven correct or wrong.
Answer:
New required rate of return = 11.88%
Explanation:
<em>The capital asset pricing model is a risk-based model. Here, the return on equity is dependent on the level of reaction of the the equity to changes in the return on a market portfolio. These changes are captured as systematic risk. The magnitude by which a stock is affected by systematic risk is measured by beta. </em>
<em>Under CAPM, Ke= Rf + β(Rm-Rf) </em>
<em>Ke- required rate of return, Rf-risk-free rate (treasury bill rate), β= Beta, Rm= Return on market.
</em>
Using the model, we work out Beta which is not given and then re-calculate the required rate of return of the new stock
<em>Ke- 11.75 % Rf- 5.5, Rm-Rf = 4.75%, β= ?</em>
11.75% = 5.50% + β(4.75%)
11.75% -5.50% = β(4.75%)
(11.75-5.50)/4.75= β
1.315789474
= β
1.315
= β
New required rate of return
5.50% + 1.315(1.02×4.75)
11.875
New required rate of return = 11.88%
