answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AnnZ [28]
2 years ago
11

Why might it be difficult to deal with people who never doubt their own infallibility?

History
1 answer:
Crazy boy [7]2 years ago
4 0

Because such people have their mind sets that they can never be wrong.

Explanation:

Infallibility is something when a person doesn't feel himself wrong. This happens when people have their minds set that they are always right and the other person engaged in the argument with them is wrong, and there is nothing wrong with them. It is actually the inability of themselves to sense their selves wrong.

No one can be infallible. Every human is fallible. So one considering himself fallible is totally wrong. It might happen sometimes that people are right in an argument, but it does not matter that they would always be right. They can be gone wrong sometimes.

It is heard and seen in our daily lives that in an argument with a person who thinks himself infallible, the other person usually says that it is better to keep quiet now, as i know you are never going to consider yourself at mistake.

So it is totally a wrong practice.

Learn more about some concept and example of infallibility at:

brainly.com/question/9196130

#LearnWithBrainly

You might be interested in
Correctly identify the outcome if the price of burritos in Colemanville drops from $7 to $4.
slega [8]

The outcome will be forecasted using the prescriptions of the law of demand. If the price of a good decreases, this will have the opposite effect on the quantity demanded by consumers, that will increase. More people would be willing to purchase the product at a lower price

In conclusion the law of demand states how price and quantity will always move in opposite directions. The only exception to the law would occur with Giffen type goods.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think Napoleon was a Good or bad ruler of France? Explain. (Because is not an appropriate answer) 3-5 sentences
Goshia [24]

Answer:

Napoleon was an excellent general.

He fought over 70 battles, and was defeated in only eight. He transformed the way in which the French army operated and turned France into the greatest military power in Europe. His confidence and ambition inspired his troops, and their victories brought glory to France.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Son of a French fur trader, one of the most successful traders in Oklahoma Territory in the early 1800s was __________. A. Epaph
stealth61 [152]

B.)  A.P. Chouteau I promise

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Before you begin studying history, you should become familiar with some of the characteristics that make history unique compared
Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

The process to study each subject is different from one another because of the difference in the sources, methods, and area of study. But what makes history different as a subject on how one extracts information from the sources. While in other subjects one can data is directly accessible that provides knowledge, in history, one has to look for the critical evaluation of the sources of data, the conditions in which the data was produced, the possibility of the written influence from his environment, etc. Therefore while studying history we the data collection process should be carefully opted.

6 0
2 years ago
Presidents often use __________ to sidestep the constitutional "advice and consent" of the senate that is required for formal ra
Korvikt [17]
<span>Presidents often use executive agreements to sidestep the constitutional "advice and consent" of the senate that is required for formal ratification of treaties. In short, the president can decide what law must be passed without ratifying it by the senate. But this kind of agreements, without the senates's consent is still legally binding so long as the agreement itself is not illegal with regards to the laws of the congress.</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was not one of Huayna Capac's accomplishments?
    5·2 answers
  • What did José Martí, Luis Muñoz Rivera, and Emilio Aguinaldo have in common?
    5·1 answer
  • Explain how whale oil affected human freedom?
    15·1 answer
  • Between 1965 and 1968, the Vietnam War was fought primarily on the sea. in the air. in the jungle. in large cities.
    11·2 answers
  • Match each action to Marbury or madison:
    9·2 answers
  • The Roman fort of Chesters is an excellent example of _____.
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes the United States? It has a market economy with no government regulation. This is the only
    5·1 answer
  • What statement best describes technological discoveries made during the Ming Dynasty? New technology was considered a threat to
    7·2 answers
  • Imagine that you are a social scientist studying Inca civilization. Your task is to create a special purpose map that will help
    13·1 answer
  • Listen to the report and interview here.<br> Intro<br> Done
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!