In the first parliament, what was the place in the government for the nobles, high churchmen and the knights?

History

2 answers:

charle [14.2K]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

cheese

Explanation:

Svetlanka [38]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The place in the government for the nobles, high churchmen and the knights in the first parliament was the House of Lords.

Explanation:

The House of Lords is the upper house of the UK Parliament. Parliament also includes the British Crown and the House of Commons. The House of Lords does not have a set number of members, but currently has 760 lords. It is an unelected body, made up of 2 archbishops and 24 bishops of the Anglican Church (Spiritual Lords), and 734 members of the British nobility (Temporal Lords). The Spiritual Lords remain in office as long as they occupy their ecclesiastical functions, while the Temporal Lords are for life. Members of the House of Lords are sometimes called Lords of Parliament.

The House of Lords was established in the fourteenth century. It was abolished in 1649 by the revolutionary government that took power during the English Civil War, but was restored in 1660. The House of Lords was more powerful than the elected House of Commons. But since the nineteenth century, the powers of the House of Lords have begun to decline: the upper house is much less relevant today than its elected counterpart.

You might be interested in

What were some of the arguments against New Deal policies? Check all of the boxes that apply.

vitfil [10]

Its all of them!!!

Your welcome

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Would Carnegie’s workers agree with his claim that the great wealth of the Gilded Age few was a good thing? Is the owner really

jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

Carnegie called for treating the workers kindly. “When relations with workers go beyond the letter of the contract, it is always beneficial for the enterprise. Nothing has served the enterprise more than the good attitude of the workers," Carnegie claimed.

The only benefit brought to mankind is the accumulation of wealth by those who have the ability and energy to produce it. In addition, without wealth there can be no Philanthropist. When providing charity, the main consideration should be the desire to help those who then help themselves; give part of the necessary funds by which those who wish to grow will receive this opportunity; provide assistance to those who want to succeed so that they can achieve this. To help only occasionally and never making everything possible. Neither the individual nor the whole of humanity are better off by alms. Worthy help, with rare exceptions, does not require it. Really valuable representatives of humanity never do this, apart from emergencies or sudden changes. These were beliefs of Carnegie.

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

COMMONLIT

timama [110]

Answer:

you didn't provide paragraph six which is needed to answer the question

5 0

2 years ago

• Según la lectura, ¿a qué se refiere el narrador cuando habla sobre las figuras siniestras que irrumpen la casa? • ¿Qué signifi

Tamiku [17]

Idk spanish sooooooooooooo sorry :)

5 0

2 years ago

"The author of the article, Arthur Brooks, has been president of the American Enterprise Institute since 2009, an organization c

Len [333]

Answer:

Brooks is the president of an organization founded to protect the American free enterprise system. As a result, he is likely biased toward free enterprise and will be more likely to argue in its favor without considering its drawbacks. Another source that would be helpful would be an article that describes the negative economic and social characteristics of free enterprise.

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago