Answer:
C) As an other financing source in the debt service fund and as an other financing use in the capital projects fund.
Explanation:
The options are missing:
- A) As a revenue in the debt service fund and as an expenditure in the capital projects fund.
-
B) As an other financing source in the capital projects fund and as an other financing use in the debt service fund.
-
C) As an other financing source in the debt service fund and as an other financing use in the capital projects fund.
-
D) As a special item in both the debt service and capital project funds.
Other financing sources is an account used by governments to record non-operating revenues and expenditures. The debt service fund is the money that the government has set aside to pay for its outstanding bonds. The capital projects fund is the account used by the government to record expenses related to certain projects.
Answer:
The statement is true
Explanation:
As a fact, I agree that with large sample sizes, even the small differences between the null value and the observed point estimate can be statistically significant.
To put it differently, any differences between the null value and the observed point estimate will be material and/or significant if the samples are large in shape and form.
It's also established that point estimate get more clearer and understandable, and the difference between the mean and the null value can be easily singled out if the sample size is bigger.
Suffix to say, however, while the difference may connote a statistical importance, the practical implication notwithstanding, will be looked and studied on a different set of rules and procedures, beyond the statistical relevance.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": perpetuity.
Explanation:
Annuities are regularly-provided income hired through insurance. Those payments can be provided within a short or long period of time until an undetermined date. That is the reason why annuities are also called perpetuities. Annuities are taxed at regular income tax rates.
Six is your answer because if it cost $2.00 and you have 4 it makes sense
Answer:
<u>B, D</u>
Explanation:
1. Alex may be favoured in court if it was proven that Alex had signed the covenant not to compete in by force or else he would have been immediately fired from MyWaze. Then he may likely gain victory.
2. The second scenario, if Alex was involved in job at Google that wasn't going to compete with MyWaze; that is rather than going to work on creating a GPS Application for Google, Alex was hired to be a programmer for Google’s e-mail system. Since the email system does not have any competition with a GPS app he may be favoured.
