answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tester [92]
2 years ago
11

Read this passage from Giovanna's evaluation of an argument claiming that climate change is not affected by human activity.

English
2 answers:
ZanzabumX [31]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The best way to continue Giovanna's evaluation is with B. text evidence of Niemand's argument.

Explanation:

In her evaluation of an article, Giovanna must first state her opinion and then support it by presenting evidence taken from the very article she is evaluating. That way, she can defend her point of view and try to convince readers that she is correct in her opinion.

Giovanna has already revealed Niemand's claim when she said his made assertions that "climate change is not affected by human activity." Thus, we now know what his article is about. However, in Giovanna's opinion, his assertions were unsubstantiated. For readers to understand why she thinks so, she must provide text evidence from Niemand's argument. She should choose the passages she thinks will prove her point and add them to her evaluation, properly discussing their lack of substance.

kompoz [17]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B because they need to back up their reasoning and arguments

You might be interested in
Look at the spaces indicated in the sentences below. Where would it be appropriate to put a semicolon (;)? A. His suitcase held
artcher [175]
The asnswer would be B. because a semicolon means that two complete sentences are being joined together as one
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"If we accept that in order to a watch to come into existence we need an intelligent watch designer, a watchmaker, by the same t
mylen [45]

Answer:Teleological proof or argument

Explanation:The teleological or physico-theological argument, is the one which is based on the fact that if all premises about the natural world are true and one agrees that they are this means that the drawn conclusion is also true about the existence of God. This is an argument used mostly to observe how true premises in the natural world are and due to these evidence drawn from the evidence of the designs seen in the natural world one can not help but conclude that they must be a sovereign God who is responsible for all those designs .

The conclusion is true when all the premises are all true.

8 0
1 year ago
Which best states how the concept of trust is portrayed in Chapter I of Nature and in Society and Solitude? Nature implies suspi
KengaRu [80]

Answer: Nature implies suspicion of others but does not state it, while Society and Solitude states directly that suspicion of others is natural.

<em>Nature</em> is an essay by Ralph Waldo Emerson, published in 1836. In this essay, Emerson defends a non-traditional appreciation of nature. It establishes the foundation of transcendentalism. <em>Society and Solitude</em>, on the other hand, is a book by the same author. This collection of essays presents the idea that both isolation and company are necessary for the development and progress of people. In his first essay, Emerson suggest that suspicion of others is natural, but he does not state it especifically. He expands on this idea in the second work.







8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the excerpt from "A Genetics of Justice” by Julia Alvarez.
Mandarinka [93]

The correct answer is option one.

First, the author describes how Dominican dictator Trujillo requires tributes to be made in his name and provides a few examples. Secondly, Alvarez explains her father's reaction to one of Trujillo's praises. Finally, she depicts the moment her mother has to go through a humiliating tribute to a dictator she does not support.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me as soon as possible! Will give Brainliest to the person who best explains why their answer is correct!
lana66690 [7]

Answer:

The answer is<em> other people have created.</em>

Explanation:

Basically what we need to eliminate from this passage is a phrase that does not give us any specific and precise information.

<em>contemporary historian</em> - gives us information about his profession and specifies the part of the history he`s the most competent for.

<em>historical expertise</em> - gives us information about the kind of work he has published

<em>other people have created</em> - this phrase does not give us any information about who these people are, what is their profession or what is their expert level; it is mostly imprecise and unspecific

<em>monotonous historical essays</em> - again we have the information about the type of the paper published and its theme

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Compare and contrast assertiveness, arrogance and passivity.
    15·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes a difference between the frame and the excerpt? Look at the frame from Iqbal
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following parts of the word “dehumanize” provide clue to its meaning? Select all that apply
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following may be used as counterarguments against the argument that nature can repair all things? Check all of the
    6·2 answers
  • What kind of structure is most common in green literature?
    14·2 answers
  • Based on the Venn diagram, which statements could accurately be used within a compare-and-contrast paragraph about farmers and v
    9·2 answers
  • Commonlit: Advice to the newly married lady
    10·1 answer
  • What connotation does the antics have in the following sentence?
    13·1 answer
  • write a brief explanation about your sources of strength and the people and things who act like the wind to help you fly or soar
    6·1 answer
  • Read the sentence.
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!