The asnswer would be B. because a semicolon means that two complete sentences are being joined together as one
Answer:Teleological proof or argument
Explanation:The teleological or physico-theological argument, is the one which is based on the fact that if all premises about the natural world are true and one agrees that they are this means that the drawn conclusion is also true about the existence of God. This is an argument used mostly to observe how true premises in the natural world are and due to these evidence drawn from the evidence of the designs seen in the natural world one can not help but conclude that they must be a sovereign God who is responsible for all those designs .
The conclusion is true when all the premises are all true.
Answer: Nature implies suspicion of others but does not state it, while Society and Solitude states directly that suspicion of others is natural.
<em>Nature</em> is an essay by Ralph Waldo Emerson, published in 1836. In this essay, Emerson defends a non-traditional appreciation of nature. It establishes the foundation of transcendentalism. <em>Society and Solitude</em>, on the other hand, is a book by the same author. This collection of essays presents the idea that both isolation and company are necessary for the development and progress of people. In his first essay, Emerson suggest that suspicion of others is natural, but he does not state it especifically. He expands on this idea in the second work.
The correct answer is option one.
First, the author describes how Dominican dictator Trujillo requires tributes to be made in his name and provides a few examples. Secondly, Alvarez explains her father's reaction to one of Trujillo's praises. Finally, she depicts the moment her mother has to go through a humiliating tribute to a dictator she does not support.
Answer:
The answer is<em> other people have created.</em>
Explanation:
Basically what we need to eliminate from this passage is a phrase that does not give us any specific and precise information.
<em>contemporary historian</em> - gives us information about his profession and specifies the part of the history he`s the most competent for.
<em>historical expertise</em> - gives us information about the kind of work he has published
<em>other people have created</em> - this phrase does not give us any information about who these people are, what is their profession or what is their expert level; it is mostly imprecise and unspecific
<em>monotonous historical essays</em> - again we have the information about the type of the paper published and its theme