answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Drupady [299]
2 years ago
5

Nasim was fired from his job after 3 years of good performance. His boss simply said that the organization was changing and did

not need Nasim’s work any longer. This type of firing is likely acceptable under the doctrine of ______.
a. employment-at-will
b. workplace monitoring
c. orientation period
d. employment variability
Business
1 answer:
SVEN [57.7K]2 years ago
5 0

Answer: D). employment variability

Explanation: Chances are he was skilled in whatever task he was assigned to. If the company is expandeing then they moast likly found a way to replace him to save on money.

You might be interested in
Match each barrier of communication to the situation with which it corresponds.
SIZIF [17.4K]

Explanation:

A communication barrier is an obstruction which put off a message to be understood correctly by the receiver. Communication barrier prevents other person from fully understand the meaning conveyed in the message or the information, thoughts or ideas transferred to the other person. Following are the situations with the appropriate communication barriers in each situation.

1) First Situation

C) Lack of Assumptions.

2) Second Situation

A) Lack of Respect

3) Third Situation

B) Inadequate Feedback

7 0
2 years ago
bram johnson invests $500 at the end of each quarter for 10 years the account earns 12% interest annually what is the value of t
Alecsey [184]
I think that the answer is 24.69. i hope it helped :)
3 0
2 years ago
Isn’t "corporate entrepreneurship" an oxymoron? Do the characteristics of an established organization, such as its routines and
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

Isn’t "corporate entrepreneurship" an oxymoron?

I guess that most people would believe that corporations and entrepreneurs and completely opposite, and for the most part they are right. But some corporations actually do have entrepreneurial spirit or at least try to. E.g. 3M is famous for allowing their employees some creative time so that they can come up with new ideas. Google is another example of a large corporation that allows for creative time while at work.

Do the characteristics of an established organization, such as its routines and structure, increase efficiency but at the same time kill any entrepreneurial spirit?

Routines, schedules and corporate structure not only kill, but they rather massacre and exterminate entrepreneurial spirit and creativity. One great example of how corporations do not allow people to think or act differently can be seen in the movie about Ford competing in Le Mans.

Is there any way that a company can have the best of both worlds?

I guess that it is difficult, but not impossible for a company to have corporate entrepreneurship. The problem is that corporations will probably believe that it is a waste of money to pay for their employees to do nothing and just wander around thinking about new ideas. Creativity has a cost and not everyone is willing to pay for it.

8 0
2 years ago
A vessel operator is involved in an accident where someone requires medical attention beyond simple first aid. how long does the
devlian [24]
The answer is: 48 hours
If the vessel operator is knowingly aware of the situation and decided not to file a written report for the victim, the vessel operator will be exposed to several risk of crime if the wound managed to took the victim's life because the court will seem him/her as responsible in the death
8 0
2 years ago
Riverboat Adventures pays $450,000 plus $5,000 in closing costs to buy out a competitor. The real estate consists of land apprai
kkurt [141]

Answer:

$150,150

Explanation:

Total fair value of all assets:

= Land + Building + Paddleboats

= $67,200 + $158,400 + $254,400

= $480,000

Building accounted for:

= Fair value of building ÷ Total fair value

= $158,400 ÷ $480,000

= 33%

Therefore, the building is 33% of the total fair value of assets.

Cost of acquisition of assets:

= Amount paid + Closing cost to buy out a competitor

= 450,000 + 5,000

= $455,000

Cost to be allocated to the building:

= Cost of acquisition of assets × Percent share in total fair value

= $455,000 × 33%

= $150,150

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Aletha has been having difficulty in her first-period history class. one day aletha misses the school bus. she has to walk to sc
    7·1 answer
  • According to Porter, which of the following factor endowments would be classified as an advanced factor?
    13·2 answers
  • On January 5, Merkel Inc. purchases office equipment for its new branch office from Norbert Company. Merkel requests that the eq
    6·1 answer
  • Red and White Company reported the following monthly data: Units produced 2,100 units Sales price $ 26 per unit Direct materials
    11·1 answer
  • Bill is working on a project involving the upgrading of a management information system. The project is being managed by the inf
    15·1 answer
  • In 2010, a particular Japanese imported automobile sold for 1,476,000 yen or $8,200. If the car still sells for the same amount
    6·1 answer
  • A company needs to locate three departments (X, Y, and Z) in the three areas (I, II, and III) of a new facility. They want to mi
    13·1 answer
  • Ask Socrates Inc. is a computer software company that employs highly intelligent, but somewhat unusual people. Every Friday, fre
    9·1 answer
  • Ms. Finkel has suggested that if given sufficient resources, she could redesign the production process to reduce the percentage
    14·1 answer
  • Simmons Consulting Co. has the following accounts in ts ledger Cash: Accounts Receivable Supplies: Office Equipment Accounts Pay
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!