Answer:
The Scopes Monkey Trial is also called The Scopes Trial. This scope was prosecuted in 1925 by a science teacher John Scopes for the teaching evolution in the school Tennessee public school which further made an illegal bill.
Scopes was not sure that he taught the subject clearly and right but he was sure that the material that he has been used is related to the evolution. But later on, John was charged for violating the Butler Act.
The answer is B. are not fit to drive
Answer:
The options are
A. Minimum acceptable behavior
B. Unethical behavior
C. Code of conduct
D. Corporate social responsibility
E. Generally accepted principle
The answer is A. Minimum acceptable standard
Explanation:
The term which the book has for the approach is having a minimum acceptable standard which is defined as the least accepted quality of a product or service.This is because of the approach being acceptable within the jurisdiction of the law.
Ms Ramos may however be unsure about the ethical standard of the approach used in this context.
Answer:
In this sort of a case I would proceed to answer to him that I will help and go get him some clothes from my car to change his look. I would then proceed to announce the need of several 10-32s to the 20 of the house Code-2 response. I would then act as if I am trying to help him while the backup patrols are en route to assist. When the assistance arrives I would proceed to pull out a firearm of any sort from my holster ordering the friend to put his hands in the air and face away the officers performing a HRS.
ANSWER: The exclusionary rule states that any evidence that is obtain illegally, (i.e without a warrant) and any statements obtained through an illegal interrogation, which violate the Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, will not be an acceptable evidence at a criminal trial in the court.
This exclutionary rule applies only to criminal case and not to civil case. Because John Bratton has a murder case charge, which are the dead bodies found in his properties. John Bratton's case is a civil case, and all evidence filed with his case should be admissible in the court of law.
Sara Sutton will not be charged for illegally selling gun, but will be charged for being a sole sponsor of a civil crime case charged against Bratton. This will make Sara Sutton to be prosecuted along side with Bratton, in the case.
If Sara Sutton is charged for illegally selling of guns, it will be a criminal case which will not be admissible by the court, due to exclusionary rule, because the police got their evidence without a search warrant.
John Bratton will not be charged for drug abuse offense, which is a criminal case, because all evidence provided will not be accepted due to exclusionary rule. Stankowitcz has busted into Bratton's apartment without a search warrant.
