answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
slavikrds [6]
2 years ago
12

A group of manufacturers of LCD screens for computers and cell phones met together monthly in private conference rooms in hotels

to discuss their markets and kept notes with phrases such as "Must act together with the Korean makers in order to reap success," and "Extremely confidential. Must not distribute." The result was that the LCD screen producers were able to command high prices for their products, prices that were non-negotiable. Which of the following statements is correct about their conduct?​
a. ​The manufacturers had engaged in a per se violation of antitrust laws.
b. ​The manufacturers violated the Sherman Act.
c. ​The manufacturers violated the Clayton Act.
d. ​both a and b
e. ​all of the above
Business
1 answer:
aleksklad [387]2 years ago
3 0

Answer: a. ​The manufacturers had engaged in a per se violation of antitrust laws.

Explanation: The Sherman and Clayton Acts would apply to US companies. The group of manufacturers of LCD screens were not specified as US companies. But by virtue of the fact of colluding with Korean makers they would have per se been violating the the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (MRFTA) of Korea.

You might be interested in
A manager reorders lubricant when the amount on hand reaches 422 pounds. Average daily usage is 45 pounds, which is normally dis
Snezhnost [94]

Answer: The risk of stock out = 2.94%

Explanation:

Reorder point is calculated as: Lead time*demand per unit time=45*9=405

While the amount on-hand reaches 422 pounds, the manager was reordering lubricant.

During the lead time, Standard Deviation of Demand =Daily S.D*(Lead time)^0.5=3*(9^0.5)=9

Risk of Stock Out=(422-405)/9 S.D=1.89 S.D

From Normal distribution curve 1.89 S.D=0.0294=2.94%

Therefore, the risk of stock out=2.94%

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Anna has $38,654 in a savings account that pays 2.3 percent interest. Assume she withdraws $10,000 today and another $10,000 one
tester [92]

Answer:

$20,676.53

Explanation:

The qeustion is to determine Future Value of the withdrawal Anna will make in 4 years

Amount in Savings - Amount Withdrawn today) x 1 + rate - Amount to be withdrawn a year from today ) x 1 + rate ∧3 years

$38,654 - $10,000 x 1.023

= $28,564 x 1.023

= 29,313.042‬- 10,000 =

19,313.042 x 1.023 ∧3

=19,313.042x 1.070599167

$20,676.53

This means that after withdrawing $10,000 to day and another $10,000 one year form today, from Anna's initial savings of $38,654, she will be able to withdraw her entire balance of $20,676.53 in 4 years time.

3 0
2 years ago
Both ________ and ________ increase as the safety inventory is increased.
Wittaler [7]
<span>False. Shortage occurs in a replenishment cycle only if the demand during the lead time exceeds the ROP. True. The fill rate increases and the cycle service level decreases as the safety inventory is increased. False. For the same safety inventory, an increase in lot size increases the fill rate but not the cycle service level.</span>
6 0
2 years ago
You want to start an organic garlic farm. The farm costs $190,000, to be paid in full immediately. Year 1 cash flows will be $25
valentina_108 [34]

Answer:

internal rate of return 31.8%

Explanation:

on excel we will list each cash flow:

Y0 -190,000

Y1   25,000

Y2    37500 (Y1 x (1+g) = 25,000 x 1.05)

Y3 56250    (37,500 x 1.05)

Y4 84375     (56,250 x 1.05)

Y5 386562.5 (84,375 x 1.05 + 260,000 from the sale)

we now write =IRR( and select the cells then, press enter

the IRR function return: 31.8503%

we round into 1 percent 31.8%

3 0
2 years ago
Trell Corporation transferred $55,000 of accounts receivable to a local bank. The transfer was made without recourse. The local
e-lub [12.9K]
Answer:
Trell will show an amount receivable from factor equal to 20, 010 dollars.
Explanation:
NON recourse factoring is when a company sells it's invoices to a factor, without the promise that the company will buy back any uncollected invoices. The factor does not take the risk of any uncollected invoices.
So in this factoring arrangement no allowance for bad debt exist
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The greater the chances are that an investment could lose money, the greater the __________ for the investor.
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a microeconomic topic?
    10·1 answer
  • Psychographic segmentation is based on ________.
    11·1 answer
  • Alejandro Alvera of Alvear Corp was reading the financial statements of Olivas Medical Supply Company to decide whether he wante
    14·1 answer
  • A local university is considering changes to its class structure in an effort to increase professor productivity. The old schedu
    12·1 answer
  • Whispering Enterprises reported cost of goods sold for 2020 of $1,515,400 and retained earnings of $4,687,300 at December 31, 20
    5·1 answer
  • Brad needs help repaying the loan he got to pursue a graduate program in a top-ranking university. If Brad opts for a work-study
    15·2 answers
  • Schweser Satellites Inc. produces satellite earth stations that sell for $100,000 each. The firms fixed costs, F, are $2 million
    5·1 answer
  • Dog Up! Franks is looking at a new sausage system with an installed cost of $460,000. This cost will be depreciated straight-lin
    6·1 answer
  • In 2007, Terry Inc. provided the following items in their footnotes. Their cost of goods sold was $22 billion under FIFO costing
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!