Main idea is what you're looking for.
C a tendency toward manipulating others for personal gain
Please vote for Brainliest :) :) :) :)
Answer:
C). It describes how testimony on the brutal practices on sugar plantations convinced Parliament to end the slave trade.
Explanation:
As per the question, in the given passage from "Sugar Changed the World", the author's central claim is to display that how 'sugar trade led to the end of slavery' which he substantiates by proposing the evidence that states 'how acute brutality of sugar plantations persuaded the parliament to change its viewpoint and mark an end to the ongoing brutal enslavement/slave trade'.
This claim is reflected through the phrase "in the age of sugar, slavery...extreme brutal' that compelled the parliament to review its norms of slavery and mark its ending. Therefore, the author states 'sugar.....link between slavery and freedom'. Thus, option C is the correct answer.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/13652825#readmore
Answer:
The central idea of the passage, which is the Grimm brothers'tragic and brutal tales, is supported with the fact that theyintended to preserve German oraltradition stories and morals that otherwise would be lost
Explanation: hope its right
Answer:
a) Potential Sources of confounding:
1) Pancreatic cancer patients were being compared with persons hospitalized for cancerous diseases. Coffee may likely aggravate the pains of pancreatic cancer patients unlike other cancer patients because the latter's cancer diseases were not digestive.
2) Unintended bias was introduced by investigators in questioning patients. The investigators asked questions on coffee drinking habits of those already hospitalized. This biased the drinking of coffee as a predisposing factor.
3) There could be differences among men and women because of other habits. While drinking more coffee predisposed women to cancer, according to the confounding statements, drinking even more did not have much difference in men.
Explanation:
"CRITICS SAY COFFEE STUDY WAS FLAWED" was an article in New York Times written by Harold M. Schmeck Jr. on June 30, 1981. It attempted to critique the study of drinking coffee and its disposal to cause cancer to the drinkers.
In this article, he introduced the views of critics of the Coffee Study which was earlier published in the New England Journal of Medicine and the accompanying refutal by the researchers.
