answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gtnhenbr [62]
2 years ago
13

Katy had two choices of routes to get her to work. She wanted to choose the route that would get her to work fastest, on average

. To determine which route would get her to work faster, on average, she randomly selected 10 days and took Route 1 on those 10 days. Then she randomly selected a different 10 days and took Route 2 on those 10 days. She recorded the time, in minutes, it took her to get from her house to work on each of those 20 days. From her data, she constructed the 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean commuting times (Route 1-Route 2) in minutes as (-1,9) Based on this confidence interval, which of the following is a correct statement? Choose the correct answer belowA. There is evidence at the 5% significance level to indicate that one route gets Katy to work faster, on average, since one bound is close to 0. B. There is not enough evidence at the 5% significance level to indicate that the average commuting times for the two routes is the same.C. There is evidence at the 5% significance level to indicate that one route gets Katy to work faster, on average, since 0 falls between the bounds of the confidence interval.D. There is not enough evidence at the 5% significance level to indicate that one route gets Katy to work faster, on average, since 0 falls within the bounds of the confidence interval.
Mathematics
1 answer:
zmey [24]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

D. There is not enough evidence at the 5% significance level to indicate that one route gets Katy to work faster, on average, since 0 falls within the bounds of the confidence interval.

Step-by-step explanation:

At 5% confidence level, Katy found difference in mean commuting times (Route 1-Route 2) in minutes as (-1,9).

Since no difference in means (0 min) falls within the confidence level (-1,9), we can not reject the hypothesis that there is no difference in mean commuting times when using Route1 or Route2.

A <em>higher</em> significance level(10% etc) may lead a <em>shorter</em> confidence interval leaving 0 outside and may reach a conclusion that Route1 takes longer than Route2

You might be interested in
A machine fills boxes weighing Y lb with X lb of salt, where X and Y are normal with mean 100 lb and 5 lb and standard deviation
Bas_tet [7]

Answer:

Option b. None is the correct option.

The Answer is 63%

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve for this question, we would be using the z score formula

The formula for calculating a z-score is given as:

z = (x-μ)/σ,

where

x is the raw score

μ is the population mean

σ is the population standard deviation.

We have boxes X and Y. So we will be combining both boxes

Mean of X = 100 lb

Mean of Y = 5 lb

Total mean = 100 + 5 = 105lb

Standard deviation for X = 1 lb

Standard deviation for Y = 0.5 lb

Remember Variance = Standard deviation ²

Variance for X = 1lb² = 1

Variance for Y = 0.5² = 0.25

Total variance = 1 + 0.25 = 1.25

Total standard deviation = √Total variance

= √1.25

Solving our question, we were asked to find the percent of filled boxes weighing between 104 lb and 106 lb are to be expected. Hence,

For 104lb

z = (x-μ)/σ,

z = 104 - 105 / √25

z = -0.89443

Using z score table ,

P( x = z)

P ( x = 104) = P( z = -0.89443) = 0.18555

For 1061b

z = (x-μ)/σ,

z = 106 - 105 / √25

z = 0.89443

Using z score table ,

P( x = z)

P ( x = 106) = P( z = 0.89443) = 0.81445

P(104 ≤ Z ≤ 106) = 0.81445 - 0.18555

= 0.6289

Converting to percentage, we have :

0.6289 × 100 = 62.89%

Approximately = 63 %

Therefore, the percent of filled boxes weighing between 104 lb and 106 lb that are to be expected is 63%

Since there is no 63% in the option, the correct answer is Option b. None.

3 0
2 years ago
Given a soda can with a volume of 36 and a diameter of 4, what is the volume of a cone that fits perfectly inside the soda can?
spin [16.1K]
First we need to find the heigh of the soda can be rearanging the volume formula, . We can make that  We know that V is 36 and radius is half of the diameter, so radius is 2. 

h = 2.87

Now, we can use the height to figure out the volume of a cone. The volume of a cone is 
R is 2 again and h is 2.87


12.56*.96 = 12.0576
So a cone with a volume of 12.0576 is the largest that will fit into the soda can
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A point is dilated with respect to the origin. Determine the value of K and state whether the dilation is an expansion or contra
vlabodo [156]
Scale Factor (K) = (new length/measure)/ (original length/measure)
for x-coordinate  = 8/2 = 4
for y-coordinate  = 16/4 = 4

K=4, expansion

K is the representation of "scale factor". Scale factor is the ratio of the lengths involved of the similar figures. It can be used to identify the kind of dilation, whether it is contraction or expansion. If the Scale Factor is greater than 1, then that means expansion and if it is less than 1, then it signifies contraction.
5 0
2 years ago
Kiley gathered the data in the table. She found the approximate line of best fit to be y = 1.6x – 4. A 2-column table with 5 row
Dimas [21]

Answer:

The residual value is -1.8 when x = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following table

x     |    y

0    |   -3

2    |    -1

3    |    -1

5    |    5

6    |    6    

Residual value:

A residual value basically shows the position of a data point with respect to the line of best fit.

The residual value is calculated as,

Residual value = Observed value - Predicted value

Where observed values are already given in the question and the predicted values are calculated by using the equation of  line of best fit.

y = 1.6x - 4

When we substitute x = 3 in the above equation then we would get the predicted value.

y = 1.6x - 4 \\\\y = 1.6(3) - 4 \\\\y = 4.8 - 4 \\\\y = 0.8

So the predicted value is 0.8

From the given table, the observed value corresponding to x = 3 is -1

So the residual value is,

Residual value = Observed value - Predicted value

Residual value = -1 - 0.8

Residual value = -1.8

Therefore, the residual value is -1.8 when x = 3

Note: A residual value closer to 0 is desired which means that the regression line best fits the data.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Savanna watches 21 hours of TV per week what is her daily rate
Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:

3 hours of tv per day

Step-by-step explanation:

there are 7 days in a week

21/7 = 3

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Use properties to find the sum or product 5x23x2
    14·1 answer
  • A carnival has two payment options. Plan A, you pay $10 admission plus $3 for each ride. Plan B, you pay a $20 admission plus $1
    11·2 answers
  • Your medical bill is $1567. You have $200 deductible, plus 75% medical insurance? How much will you pay?
    14·1 answer
  • Which expression shows the distance on the number line between 2 and −7?
    10·2 answers
  • Ezra is saving money to buy a snowboard that costs $225. He already has $45 and can earn the rest by walking ten dogs. If d repr
    9·1 answer
  • Jake forgot to replace the cap on a bottle of deodorant. The deodorant began to evaporate at the rate of 12% per day. If the ori
    11·1 answer
  • You work two jobs. You earn $9.80 per hour as a salesperson and $7.84 per hour stocking shelves. Your combined earnings this mon
    8·1 answer
  • Why is a lame elephant like adding 10 and 3
    7·1 answer
  • At Thanksgiving, Mrs. Jones overcooked the turkey so all but StartFraction 4 Over 5 EndFraction of it had to be thrown away. The
    9·2 answers
  • When traveling to the airport, your checked baggage must be under 50 pounds. There are about 2.2 lbs. in one kilogram. What is t
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!