Answer:
It does not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to evaluate if a particular transaction carried out between a customer and an inn falls within the dictates of the local consumer protection law in the state.
Firstly, we look at what the local consumer protection law of the state talks about. It explicitly stated that customers should get receipts when suppliers receive deposits from them. Thus, this make the receipt act as the first thing to have if there would be any claim under the consumer protection law for the transaction carried out in the state.
Now, looking at the particular scenario we have, the customer paid for the room, but he was not issued a receipt. This makes the case not treatable within the consumer protection law of the state as the receipt which should have been a prerequisite for further exploration is not available
Answer: C) the demand for coffee beans has increased
Explanation:
The law of supply states that: "all things being equal" the higher the price the higher the quantity supplied and the lower the price, the lower the quantity supplied.
Coffee growers sold just 200 million pounds of coffee when the price was $2 per pound but they increased their supply of coffee to 240 million pounds when the price per pound is $3.
This is an evidence to show that suppliers supply more products when price increase in order for them to make more profits.
Answer:
If CF0 is positive and all the other CFs are negative, then you can still solve for I
TRUE. This will be the formula for ordinary annuity.

This is the case of a loan on which the company receives a positive cash flow at the beginning and then makes subsequent cash payments, thus negatives cash flows.
Explanation:
If you have a series of cash flows, and CF0 is negative but each of the following CFs is positive, you can solve for I, but only if the sum of the undiscounted cash flows exceeds the cost
FALSE If the sum is below the cost then it will give a negative rate
To solve for I, one must identify the value of I that causes the PV of the positive CFs to equal the absolute value of the FV of the negative CFs. FALSE you can't compare a present value with a future as they are on different dates.
It is impossible to find the value of I without a computer or financial calculator.
FALSE There are method of approximation the difference is that the computer does this faster than humans.
If you solve for I and get a negative number, then you must have made a mistake
FALSE if the project return are lower than cost the rate will be negative.
Answer:
Journal entry
Explanation:
The Journal entry is shown below:-
1. Cash Dr, $46,000
To Notes payable $46,000
(Being issuance of notes is recorded)
2. Interest expense Dr, $230
Notes payable Dr, $659.31
To Cash $889.31
(Being payment of first installment is recorded)
3. Interest expense Dr, $226.70
Notes payable Dr, $662.61
To Cash $889.31
Working note :-
First installment interest expenses
= $46,000 × 6% × 1 month ÷ 12 month
= $230
Second installment interest expenses
= ($46,000 - $659.31) × 6% × 1 month ÷ 12 month
= $45,340.68 × 6% × 1 ÷ 12
= $226.70
Answer:
The answer is "1.1"
Explanation:
In the case of a single Interest, the principal value is determined as follows:

In case of discount:

Let income amount = 100, time = 1.5 years, and rate =20 %.
Formula:
A = P(1+rt)
A =P+I
by putting vale in the above formula we get the value that is = 76.92, thus method A will give 76.92 value.
If we calculate discount then the formula is:
P = M(1-rt)
M = 100 rate and time is same as above.

Thus Method B will give the value that is 70
calculating ratio value:
