Answer:
A- Group think
Explanation:
In group think, bad decisions are often made because, rather than consider other alternatives, a group of people agree to a decision suggested by, in most cases, the most superior party in the room.
This form of thinking hides true opinions of other members of the group and though the decision is agreed upon, they could truly not want to be a part of the process.
In this scenario, there is an agreement with the Senior Executive on the plan of action however, nobody is interested in taking up the responsibility to follow through with the plan. This indicates a level of disagreement of other members with the plan regardless of the initially stated agreement with the plan.
Answer:
b. $100,420
Explanation:
Amount paid for investment $100,000
Add: Share of net income $400
($1000*40%)
Add: Share of other comprehensive income <u>$20 </u>
($50*40%)
Investment at the end of 2021 <u>$100,420
</u>
<u></u>
Answer:
Option A.
Includes partnering rather than competing with existing distributors
Explanation:
Through internet retailing, a business can partner with other distributors and enlist the products of the distributors on their website along side their products.They can charge a fee for each product sold via their platform, which can serve as additional revenue to the business, without much extra costs. This is because the platform is already available.
This is the business model that companies such as Amazon apply. They enlist products of other businesses on their online platform, sell them and make some profit for themselves.
This is what gives internet retailing a strong appeal.
Answer:
The regional aircraft will presumably have a higher break-even point the original investment point than a furniture maker in light of the fact that the majority of a carrier's expenses are fixed . It is imperative to take note of that despite the fact that the two organizations report indistinguishable income and total compensation figures, their equal the initial investment focuses will probably contrast fundamentally due to contrasts in their cost structures.
Answer:
DeShawn not take offer engine detailing service
Explanation:
given data
cost = $40
charges = $75
total price = $90
additional charges = $20
to find out
Should DeShawn continue offer
solution
we know here De shawn marginal benefit is
marginal benefit = total price - charges
marginal benefit = 90 - 75
marginal benefit = $15
and
we have given additional charges is $20
so
we see marginal cost here less than the marginal revenue
so DeShawn not take offer engine detailing service
