Answer: 2,200 units.
Explanation:
The complete exercise is:
A manufacturer shipped units of a certain product to two locations. The equation above shows the total shipping cost T, in dollars, for shipping c units to the closer location and shipping f units to the farther location. If the total shipping cost was $47,000 and 3,000 units were shipped to the farther location, how many units were shipped to the closer location?
Given the following equation:
You know that "T" is the total shipping cost (in dollars), "c" is the number of units shipped to the closer location and "f" is the number of units shipped to the farther location.
Based on the information given in the exercise, you can identify that, in this case:
Then, knowing those values, you need to substitute them into the given equation:
And finally, you must solve for "c" in order to calculate the number of units that were shipped to the closer location.
You get that this is:
Answer:
The BCWS is also known as Planned Value (PV).
So, in this way, <em>PV = 3.125.000</em>
Explanation:
With the data we can obtain the PV as follows:
First, let's calculate EV as EV = CV + AC.
EV = -500.000 + 4.000.000 = <em>3.500.000</em>
After this, we can calculate PV with this formula: SPI = EV/PV
PV = EV/SPI
PV = 3.500.000/1.12 = <em>3.125.000</em>
<em />
<em>We can conclude, with these results, that the project actually is forward about the schedule but with an overcost about the budget. In other words, the project advance must be 41% but now is on 36% due to the negative variance on the costs (CV).</em>
<em />
<span>Answer:
E(R) = 3.80 + .88(9.60 - 3.80) = 8.90 percent</span>
Answer:
The right solution is "600000".
Explanation:
The given values are:
Cost of office furniture,
= $100,000
Cost of the computer system,
= $500,000
- The changed MACRS enables a company to reduce the mortgage balance of such deteriorating properties over time.
- Throughout the very first years, MACRS permits quicker depreciation although subsequently slows down depriving. This seems to be fantastic for corporations from a tax point of view.
Now,
The cost recovery deduction will be:
= 
On substituting the values, we get
= 
= 
