Ask question

Ask question

All categories

WINSTONCH [101]

2 years ago

11

A company has the following three events in December: 1. December 1 - Pay last month's rent (November), $500. 2. December 15 - P

ay rent for the current month (December), $500. 3. December 31 - Pay rent for the following year, $6,000. How much would be recorded as Rent Expense for the month of December using accrual-basis accounting?

1 answer:

bearhunter [10]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

A transformation T: (x, y) (x + 3, y + 1). For the ordered pair (4, 3), enter its preimage point.

(-1, 2)

(1, 2)

(7, 4)

Explanation:

A transformation T: (x, y) (x + 3, y + 1). For the ordered pair (4, 3), enter its preimage point.

(-1, 2)

(1, 2)

(7, 4)

You might be interested in

Read the following scenario and answer the question in 5 sentences at least.

tamaranim1 [39]

Answer and Explanation:

1. Business implication: if there are no trade barriers, it would enable them get better raw materials for their business and increase customer base

Legal anti trust implication: lobbying is illegal in some countries

2. Business implication: this would attract more manufacturers who were not previously members of the association which would in turn promote the goals of the association in improving trade amongst the manufacturers

Legal anti trust implication: associatio may be exposed to legal examination, example increased regulations

3 business implications:sales territories would invariably create a safe and secure investment for manufacturers such that there is less cost of marketing and campaigning as consumers are guaranteed

Legal implications: this is against anti trust laws and goes against free trade policies and illegal monopoly

4 business implications: boycotting this supplier could create an alternative source of raw materials which wouldn't be as efficient and even cost more

Legal implications: boycotting a large supplier such as this who might have a political backing might bring political retaliations from the supplier's political proxies who might create other regulations in the supplier's favour

6 0

2 years ago

We would expect the total utility of diamonds to be __________ than the total utility of water and the marginal utility of diamo

Gennadij [26K]

We would expect the total utility of diamonds to be <u>lower</u> than the total utility of water and the marginal utility of diamonds to be <u>higher</u> than the marginal utility of water.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The diamond-water paradox presents the puzzling predictions: while water is definitely essential to human existence because without water life can not function, the water price is relatively low. Alternatively, diamonds are actually far less essential to human life, but diamond prices are considerably higher. Thus the effectiveness obtained from water is evidently very high while the utility extracted from diamonds is considerably less.

Here total utility is the aggregate satisfaction of desires and needs gathered from the consumption of a good while marginal utility is the additional satisfaction of desires and needs received from the consumption of one additional unit of good.

7 0

2 years ago

Your uncle holds just one stock, East Coast Bank (ECB). You agree that this stock is relatively safe, but you want to demonstrat

g100num [7]

Complete question:

Assume that your uncle holds just one stock, East Coast Bank (ECB), which he thinks has very little risk. You agree that the stock is relatively safe, but you want to demonstrate that his risk would be even lower if he were more diversified. You obtain the following returns data for West Coast Bank (WCB). Both banks have had less variability than most other stocks over the past 5 years.

Year ECB WCB

2004 40.00% 40.00%

2005 -10.00% 15.00%

2006 35.00% -5.00%

2007 -5.00% -10.00%

2008 15.00% 35.00%

a. What is the expected return and risk of each stock?

b. Measured by the standard deviation of returns, by how much would your uncle's risk have been reduced if he had held a portfolio consisting of 60% in ECB and the remainder in WCB? In other words, what is the difference between portfolio's standard deviation and weighted average of components' standard deviations? (Hint: check the example on page 11-12 on my note).

Solution:

The estimated return of the stock is the average profit.

So the average of ECB is (40-10+35-5+15)/5

= $\frac{75 percent}{5}$

= 15% expected return

WCB expected return = 40+15-5-10+35

= $\frac{75 percent}{5}$

= 15%

They've had the same planned return.

This is generally defined in the Greek letter Mu, (U) A weighted average may also be used to calculate portfolio volatility.

Standard deviation of ECB is $\sqrt{{ sum [(x-U)^2]/5}}$

so for ECB:

$(40-15)^2$ = $25^2$ =6.25%

$(-10-15)^2$ = $-35^2$ = 0.1225

$(35-15)^2$ = $20^2$ = 0.04

$(-5-15)^2$ = $-20^2$ = 0.04

$(15-15)^2$ =0

now 0.0625+0.1225+0.04+0.04+0=0.265

stdev= $\sqrt{(0.265/5)}$ = 0.23

So WCB is the same except in a different order to make things quick I'm only going to add the median again WCB=0.23

Then the 60/40 portfolio will be the "weighted average" of the returns.

portfolio returns

2004: (60%*40%)+(40%*40%) = 40%

2005: (60%*-10%)+(40%*15%) = 0%

2006: (60%*35%)+(40%*-5%) = 19%

2007: (60%*-5%)+(40%*-10%) = -7%

2008:(60%*15%)+(40%*35%) = 23%

we have an average return of (40+19-7+23)/5 = 75/5 =15%

The estimated return of all combined stocks is a better way to do so.

we knew they both had expected returns of 15% so we can say

(60%*15%)+(40%*15%)=15% so the portfolio has an expected return of 15%

Now we do the standard deviation for the whole portfolio and get

$(40-15)^2$ = $25^2$ =6.25%

$(0-15)^2$ = - $25^2$ =6.25%

$(19-15)^2$ = $4^2$ = 0.16%

$(-7-15)^2$ = $-22^2$ = -4.84%

$(23-15)^2$ = $8^2$ = 0.64%

now add them up and get 9.78%

$\sqrt{(9.78%/5)}$ = 13.98%

Therefore, the normal portfolio variance is 13.98 per cent and the predicted portfolio return is 15 per cent.

Every stock has a standard deviation of 23 per cent and an average return of 15 per cent, meaning that the fund has the same estimated return but with less standard deviation. This ensures that the same gain is less costly. It's stronger than any of these products.

5 0

2 years ago

What is a joint venture? Multiple Choice an effort in which one firm grants access to its patents and trademarks for a fee an ar

natali 33 [55]

Answer:

A cooperative effort among two or more organizations that share a common interest in a business enterprise or undertaking.

Explanation:

A joint venture is defined as a business agreement where two or more parties pool their resources together to achieve a common goal. Usually profits and losses are shared equally among the parties unless there is an agreement to share otherwise.

The joint venture is an independent entity that is seperate from its owners. That means any liability of the joint venture is not binding on the parties involved.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Marigold Corp. reported the following year-end information: beginning work in process inventory, $90000; cost of goods manufactu

Stels [109]

Answer:

=$854,000

Explanation:

The cost of goods sold is the expense incurred by a manufacturing firm when making goods to be sold to customers. It is calculated using the formula.

Cost of goods sold = Beginning Stock plus purchases/ cost of goods manufactured minus ending stock

Marigold Corp:

Beginning stock: $162,000

Ending stock: $174,000

cost of goods manufactured, $866000;

cost of goods sold =

$162,000 + 866,000 -$174,000

=$854,000

7 0

2 years ago