<span>Black and white liberal reformers struggled to ameliorate the oppressive practices by forming groups like the NAACP in 1909 and the National Urban League in 1911.
</span><span>Septima Clark established Citizenship Schools for civil rights across the South, and Ella Baker worked to improve conditions in the South.</span>
Answer and Explanation:
The action taken by the department of Middlebury history is right as Wikipedia is a source of information on which ordinary people contribute to the content of the posts. We may say that the fact that its sources can be used in tests or articles is not so accurate.
It must be utilized as a learning get-together apparatus just and the data one get from their ought to be affirmed from some dependable source.
She will demand they recognize her superiority.
I worked with a lady like this once. It was a real treat.
Answer:
I would say that the best answer to the statement: The tests the trainer gave were intended to measure more than just recall of facts about the book, would be: False.
Explanation:
The example that we are shown here comes from situations that are given in a test that is known as the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Test, and they are intended to measure the capability that a person has to reason, and think critically.
In this case, we would say that the statement is false regarding the case in question, because the trainer issues the tests not to measure either the recall, or the abilities and concepts that the students acquired from the book, but she actually wanted to see if the video format of teaching was actually more efficient than the actual book. Given that this was her intention, to measure the video vs. the book, in achieving her final goal, which was acquirement of skills and concepts on Time Management, her test must have been geared towards that end, and not to simply measure the book´s impact. It was a bonus that afterwards she found that those students who were exposed to the video later on decided to read the book. Given the information on the case itself, we can reason that the answer is false.
Answer and Explanation:
The first claim says famous people use Fabuzene in secret
The second claim says Fabuzene is a sure way of feeling healthier(not necessarily healthy)
The third claim says Fabuzene is safe and effective and evidence of this is backed by medical studies
The fourth claim says Fabuzene is cheap because it costs "only" $29.95
The fifth claim says Fabuzene ensures weight loss and does this easily.
in summary this advertisement claims Fabuzene is safe, effective and cheap and is used in secret by celebrities.
