Options
alternatives available are listed below. Which security would enable the highest level of risk diversification? a. 0.0
b. 0.25
c. -0.25
d. -0.75
e. 1.0
Answer:
d. -0.75
Explanation:
In management of risk, diversification is a tool that combines a wide variety of investments within a portfolio.
The least negative security provides the highest level of risk diversification.
In this case, it's -0.75
Diversification spreads risks across various investments, the goal being to increase your odds of investment success and thereby, reducing the risk of loss, i.e. when the ROI on one investment is poor over a certain period, the ROI on others may perform better over that same period.
Answer: The sale price to the nearest dollar was $61,202
We arrive at the answer as follows:
The term 'netted' refers to the seller's profits after deducting costs and commissions.
Hence we need to add back these amounts to arrive at the sale price.
Net Proceeds $55,000
<u>Add: Costs $1,000 </u>
Total $56,000
The commission is 8.5%; however commissions are quoted as a percentage of sales price.
Expressed in other words, if the sale price was 100, commissions were 8.5. That would mean that the total above would be the equivalent of 
From this we can arrive at the sale price as follows:
Question Completion:
Group of answer choices:
a. Due to the possibility of earthquake damage, Gubenator should decline coverage for the Freedom Tower.
b. Given the notoriety of the tower and the likelihood of positive press for providing coverage, Gubenator should insure the Freedom Tower.
c. Gubenator has the financial capacity to issue the policy.
d. Gubenator should insure the Freedom Tower only if it can obtain reinsurance for part of the risk from other insurance companies, since a total loss could be catastrophic to Gubenator.
Answer:
American Builders, Inc (Freedom Tower) and Gubenator Insurance Company
d. Gubenator should insure the Freedom Tower only if it can obtain reinsurance for part of the risk from other insurance companies, since a total loss could be catastrophic to Gubenator.
Explanation:
Option A establishes that the earthquake occurrence is a possibility and not a probability. That means it cannot be reasonably estimated that an earthquake may occur. Gubernator exists to insure property against the occurrence of risky events. It should go ahead and do its business. And it can spread the risk with other insurance companies through Reinsurance. Gubernator is not in the business of looking for cheap publicity, so option B is ruled out. Given that the Freedom Tower will only be one of the many properties insured by Gubernator, we cannot use its current capital to judge its capacity to handle the Freedom Tower; thus ruling out option C.
Answer:
Information
Explanation:
The automation capturesthe customer's information and speeds up the ordering process.
I hope my answer helps you
