The answer to this question is <span>Nature contributes substantially to the monkeys' preference for visual novelty.
It's very important for monkey to utilize thier visual novelty in order to gather enough foods and avoid predators in the jungle. Humans needs no such things because we just use our visual capability to navigate without having to worry about foods or predators.</span>
Answer:
The ethics of the manufacturers is less sensitive in marketing such products, most a times what they are after is profit at all cost, and they know clearly that children are mostly taken away by what they see and they cant resist it once they see such products.
The action that should be taken is to ensure that cereal aisle abide by some certain rules and regulations of not keeping such products on display but they should be on demand by either the parents or children accompanied by an adult.
Explanation:
Answer:
the long-distance commutes of low-wage service employees.
Explanation:
Wealth gap is the difference between the richest and poorest citizens living in a geographical location based on the level of their assets and net worth i.e assets minus their debts.
Generally, the information generated by the government based on the wealth gap of its citizens is typically used for formulating economic policies, plan and financial budgets.
Economic segregation includes gated communities, exclusive apartment buildings and wealth inequality that combines to increase the wealth gap between the poor and rich people.
In this scenario, a researcher studying income and wealth inequality decides to focus on economic segregation. In addition to observing such features of economic segregation as gated communities and exclusive apartment buildings, it would also be a very good idea to include observations and analysis of the long-distance commutes of low-wage service employees to and from their place of work.
Answer:
Individualism- Collectivism
Explanation:
Individualism tends to focus on individual goal and right,and most times being motivated or encouraged by personal or individual benefits or reward.
Collectivism tends to focus not on individual goal but group goals. This means that, it values the group goals or benefit more than the individual benefit.
It has been researched and discovered that American are individualist while Japan or china are collectivist. This because, Japanese prefer to reflect the views of their culture and leaders rather than their personal view, also prefer to have small friends that can be trusted to having plenty friends, while the Americans practice freedom of choice, meaning that they are free to do what they want to do at any time based on their own or personal free will.
In this case, Darren exhibits individualism while Itsumi exhibits collectivism.
<span>Attribution errors fall into four main classes i.e
i. Fundamental attribution error where we explain the behavior of another person by emphasizing the role of dispositional factors and minimize the role of situational factors e.g. assuming that a football team loses a match because they are useless and not because they are jetlagged and tired from a long flight .
ii) Actor-observor bias. Here we maximize the effect of dispositional factors in others' behavior whilst minimizing the effect of situational factors. We also go on to minimize the effect of dispositional factors on our own behavior while maximizing the effect of situational factors. e.g when one says a coworker fails to complete a task because they are lazy but when that same individual fails to complete an assingment they attrubute it to unrealistic deadlines.
iii) Self-serving bias. Here a person tends to take responsibility for success and blames failure on external factors e.g you win at poker because you are a good player but when you lose it is because the deck is stacked.
iv) Hostile attribution bias. When we interpret the actions of others as hostile even without evidence to dispute the benignity of the same. e.g. when you assume that two whispering strangers are talking ill about you ignoring the fact that in all likelihood they are simply having a private conversation.
In the given example winning at poker and explaining that you are good at cards and have good luck is self-serving bias. The results of the success at the card game is attributed to the victor's playing prowess as well as possession of good fortune. When losing this individual would likely blame it on "bad luck" and not on the skills of the competitors.</span>
