Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois were two important leaders of the Black community in the United States. However, they each had very different opinions about the role of the African community, and on how equality could be achieved.
Booker T. Washington believed that the Black community needed to adopt a philosophy of self-help, racial solidarity and accomodation. He believed that African Americans had the duty to educate themselves and improve their livelihood in order to be taken seriously by white Americans. On the other hand, W.E.B. DuBois believed that this approach only put an extra burden on black people, while ignoring the responsibilities of whites. He argued that social change had to come through political change, and advocated political action.
I believe that their differences were as substantial as the friction between their followers. The two men had very different opinions about race and advancement. Moreover, I believe that the opinions of Booker T. Washington were more suited to the temper of the times as he took a more positive view of white people and a more negative view of conflict and political activism.
Answer
Experimental
Explanation
An experimental research is any conducted research with a scientific approach where a set of variables are kept constant while the other set of variables are measured as the subject of the experiment.The study involves the random assignment of participant into different groups.
To be considered as an experimental study, it should give some sort of treatments to a group and recording the effects. (such as controlling type of mil children drink). Despite the uncertainty whether the result is accurate.
Handball is a game in which the ball is hit with the hand in a walled court. It is a combination of basketball, soccer and Netball.
Handball is played on various types of courts, including those with one, three and four walls. The most common type of the court is four wall court, although such a court actually has five hitting surfaces if one counts the ceiling.
Answer:
Safe harbor peer review
It is a nursing peer review process that a nurse may initiate when asked to engage in an assignment or conduct that the nurse believes in good faith would potentially result in a violation of the Nursing Practice Act (NPA).
Explanation:
A nurse is free to invoke safe harbor at any time during their shift, including if an assignment changes along the way. To invoke safe harbor, the nurse must notify the supervisor in writing that they are invoking safe harbor.