Answer:
Authorial reticence allows the narrator to exaggerate
Explanation:
Authorial reticence can be defined as a term with lack of clear conclusion, description, opinions etc. about an event. More so, It allows the narrator to exaggerate and hence escape the judgement. Many readers abhor authorial reticence due to absence of clear judgement. Their authors are permitted to include fantasies and magics which will make readers concluding things based on their own perspectives. Furthermore, It leaves readers in the state of uncertainty and no clear conclusion is reached.
This scroll shows and illustrates a very delicate and intense emotional scene from "The Tale of Genji". The illustration shows prince being sad while holding the baby as he knows that the baby is not his son but the child's father is in fact Genji's nephew.
<span>The answer to the question is, "It seems that Kahlo's parents did not care about their daughter." This statement is asserting a subjective opinion that is open to interpretation depending on the overall emotion of the reader and author. The other statements, "Frida Kahlo's parents did not visit her in the hospital. The Kahlo family struggled with poverty and other issues. Matita, Frida's sister, came frequently to help at the hospital," are just asserting facts, not opinions.</span>
Answer:
Fernando should keep his claim the same. He should also keep the information about how plastic water bottles pollute the land and oceans. He should then add the new information about how plastic bottles have BPA and tell how that hurts people. He should finish by listing the ways that plastic water bottles are bad for the environment and health.
Explanation:
i typed something random, got it right and then showed me the sample response which is the answer
