Well you didn't post the expressions but let X be the amount of money for first place. This means X-50 would be the amount of second place because <span>each subsequent place after 1st wins $50 less than the previous place. Thirds, would be X-50-50 or X-100
Thus the total amount of money would be all of the values combined which is X+X-50+X-100=3X-150
</span>
The given expression can be simplified in many ways by grouping like terms. The simplest form is obtained by factoring out a²b which gives us the following expression.
a²b(7 + 10b +14b²)
12 problems = 30 minutes
24 problems = 60 minutes
36 problems= 90 minutes
48 problems = 120 minutes
60 problems = 150 minutes
Mary can respond 60 problems in 2 hours and 30 minutes/ 2 hours and half/ 150 minutes.
Hope this helps xx
Answer:
1) Juans claim is incorrect. The correct experimental probablilty is 2/9
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The expressions are not equivalent because Ella did not know that you can’t use substitution to test for equivalence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Equivalent algebraic expressions are those expressions which on simplification give the same resulting expression.
Two algebraic expressions are said to be equivalent if their values obtained by substituting any values of the variables are same.
Two expressions 3f+2.6 and 2f+2.6 are not equivalent, because when f=1,
3f + 2.6 = 3.1 + 2.6 = 3 + 2.6 = 5.6
2f + 2.6 = 2.1 + 2.6 = 2 + 2.6 = 4.6
5.6 = 4.6
Method of substitution can only help her to decide the expresssions are not equivalent, but if she wants to prove the expressions are equivalent, she must prove it for all values of f.
3f + 2.6 = 2f + 2.6
3f = 2f
3f - 2f = 0
f = 0
This is true only when f=0.
Hence,
The expressions are not equivalent because Ella did not know that you can’t use substitution to test for equivalence.
