Umm I mean no one should have a bad deaf but if they did something bad
Since the very beginning of the sentence, the phrase <em>last night</em> indicates that the action in the sentence was performed in the past. In other words, the action described in the sentence has already happened. For this reason, the verb that completes the sentence with the appropiate verb tense has to be a verb in past tense. Thus, the correct answer is revised, which is the only verb from the list that is in past tense.
Answer:
The author highlights a woman’s inability to borrow money without a man’s signature.
Explanation:
I cant be sure about the answer because I have not read the passage, but this is a real example of the social issue of gender inequality.
The error is in italics and bolded for you:
<em>THERE'S</em> NOW SEVEN NEW FLAVORS!
The correct way to write the sentence should be like this:
<em>THERE ARE</em> NOW SEVEN NEW FLAVORS!
The reason it is <em>There are </em>and not <em>there's(there is)</em>, is because you are talking about the new flavors being in the present tense form. Like... it's hard to explain, I guess...
Hope this helps!!!!
<em />
a,b, and c hope this helps