Answer:
North Park $13,000 $16,000 N
Upper River Beach 6,000 8,000 Y
South Shore 29,000 30,000 Y
Green Creek 900 1,300 N
Explanation:
The cleanup will happen in the area where the marginal benefit is more than the marginal cost. the North park will not be cleaned up. River beach will be cleaned Up. South shore will be cleaned up. Green creak will not be cleaned up.
Answer:
YTM approximated 4.08%
Explanation:
If the price of the bond changes to 1,060
we will need to calcualte the YTM
we could do it with an approxmation method like this:
Cuopon payment =1,000 x 4.5% = 45
Face value = 1,000
Purchase value= 1,060
n= 20 years
quotient 4.0776699%
It will yield approximately 4.08%
1) Road
accident officials may visit the claimant in person, to confirm the
authenticity of the claim.
<span>2) The
RAF should reinstate their existing system (the fault-based compensation
system) with a new system proposed in the high court, called the Road Accident
Fund Benefit Scheme (RABS) – a no fault benefit system – that will pardon the
affected driver from civil liability.</span>
<span>3) Certify
that there is slight intermediary intervention as possible. For instance, lessen
the amount that lawyers take as a cut from pay-out.</span>
<span>4) Utilize more efficient employees, who can make
certain that the administrative side of the RAF runs as reasonably and smoothly
as possible, with as little deceitful behavior and corruption as possible. </span>
<span> </span>
Answer:
The right answer is, False.
Explanation:
Nowadays companies seek to improve the attitudes, knowledge and skills of their employees, through training activities so that everyone works synergistically in achieving the objectives of organizations.
Answer:
Retaliation
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that in addition to his first filing, he is now eligible to also file a Retaliation complaint against his employer. This is a complain that is usually filed when an employer retaliates by firing an employee who made a discriminatory complaint against them. Which is exactly what happened in this situation since the employee was fired because he filed a complaint with the EEOC because his employer would not accommodate his religious needs.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly
