Answer:
d.Any new costs incurred in FFC's production process after the split-off point can be traced to one of the three final products.
Explanation:
the following statements regarding the new costs incurred in the FFC production process after the split-off point : any new costs incurred in FFC's production process after the split-off point can be traced to one of the three final products.
Costs before the split-off point will have to be allocated as joint costs but those costs incurred in the production process after the split-off point are directly traceable to the final products.
Answer:
e. None of the above.
Explanation:
When the stock price follows a random walk the price today is said to be equal to the prior period price plus the expected return for the period with any remaining difference to the actual return due <u>due to new information related to the stock"</u>. This is because any new information on stock which is unrelated to stock prices will lead to an increase/decrease in the stock price over a period of time.
Answer:
Total deductible organization expenses is $ 6,611
Explanation:
Upto $ 5000 in qualifying organization expenses are deductible in the year they are incurred , with the amount reduced by the amount by which total organizational expenses exceed $50,000. With a total of $51,000 Crimson corp could deduct $ 4000 .
In addition , the remaining $ 47,000 is amortized over 15 years or 180 months , begining in the period in which the entity commences operations. Since crimson began operaions in March 2016 , amortization would be for 10 months ( march 2016 - december 2016 )
Amoritzation for march 2016 to december 2016 = 10 / 180 * $47,000
= $2611
Total deductible organization expenses = $4,000 + $ 2,611
= $ 6,611
Answer:
Reactively, Proactively.
Explanation:
The above statement deals computing forces companies dealings with customers. Generally, in real-life dealings, we cannot afford to have a choice between Proactive and Reactive approaches. Proactive approach is generally more effective in terms of avoiding /reducing loss of life and property etc. however, it depends on the situation, time available to take action and resource availability. I have seen that even in the case of worst natural disasters like cyclones , proactive approach by civic authorities ,on the basis of limited scientific forecast inputs available, helped in averting major damages.
However, if there is a sudden accident, we have no other choice but to react on the spot. In some situations, like disasters ( man-made or natural) , a combination of proactive and reactive approaches can be more effective.
Answer:
it is not easy to carry out the functions of marketing intermediaries, and that probably they will not perform them very efficiently.
Explanation:
Marketing intermediaries play a huge role in the market channel distribution of all goods. They help reduce or rather bridge that gap that exist between the producers and the final consumers. Marketing intermediaries play a vital role in which they are specialized in. The role they are specialized in cannot just be picked and played easily by any other agent like the producer. As marketing intermediaries, they are specialized in their job duties and because of that are the most effective and efficient in playing that role. It thus, becomes very difficult to carry out functions of what you aren't specialized in.
