Answer:
The School Board says Libby and her friends released an unauthorized publication on school grounds. Their defense should be "the whole program (including content, publication, and location) was discussed with and approved by her teacher (her primary interface with the school hierarchy)" If there is any fault to be found, it falls on a) the Teacher's head since she didn't advise Libby to seek permission from any other members in the hierarchy, and/or b) the hierarchy itself for not conveying the need to seek permission for thios type of program. I'm sure other "publications" (artwork, themes, book reports, biographies, and so on) can be shown to set precedent for publications on school grounds without formal permissions.
Re First Ammendment Rights: The description of documents in the ammendment clearly parallels the content of the newspaper. Per referenced source": Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy are almost always permitted. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors and inventors over their works and discoveries (copyright and patent), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others (slander). Distinctions are often made between speech and other acts which may have symbolic significance.
Despite the exceptions, the legal protections of the First Amendment are some of the broadest of any industrialized nation, and remain a critical, and occasionally controversial, component of American jurisprudence.
Explanation:
The appropriate response would be: tell
the guest that you cannot serve them any more alcohol and get help from the
guests' friends.
<span>Other
responses that would help are the following: </span>
<span>
</span>Offer the guest water or any drinks as an alternative of
alcohol.
<span>
</span>Try to get the guest to eat some food to delay the affects of the
alcohol.
<span>
</span>Make sure that the guest's friend can drive or if not, call a
taxi.
Answer: This is not plagiarism
Which of the following is true for the Student Version?
Word-for-Word plagiarism
Paraphrasing plagiarism
This is not plagiarism
Explanation:
Plagiarism is the use of a published work without attributing credit to the author. Word-for-word plagiarism is when a body of text is copied from the original work and made to seem like one's work.
Paraphrasing Plagiarism rewrites the text by substituting words with their synonyms but it still has the same information as the original text.
In this question, the student's version is different from the original text. The student argues for the efficiency of rapid prototyping while the original text explains why it is a possible design methodology for instructional design. What they both have in common is that they mention how successful rapid prototyping has been in software design.
Answer:
Conflict interaction-ism theory
Explanation:
Marx carl has been proposed theory named conflict theory. Conflict occurs in society when people are fighting competencies for limited resources. The social order has been maintained by power and domination rather than conformity and the consensus.
Conflict theory is the competition between the groups and the classes that are used to maintain the inequality in the society and the dominance of the ruling party.
Thus Angela conflicts with the white ruling in America.
No, they wouldn't.
They believed that the best method to reduce crimes is by giving the persons who are most likely to conducted crimes with something meaningful that could discourage them from doing the crime. (Such as new job opportunities, or the love of friends and families)