Answer:
The frustration-aggression hypothesis
Explanation:
The frustration-aggression hypothesis is a psychological social theory. It explains the origin of aggression from frustration. This hypothesis is used in scapegoat and hate crime. The frustration occurs when the source of the economy gets down. This hypothesis was developed by John Dollar ed at Yale University.
The aggression is always projected on small groups of people which is called the scapegoat. Frustration always leads to aggression in a person. Thus here in the above context when Sam interrupted Paul several times he got frustrated. At last, he turns his frustration into aggression. When Sam enters the room he threatens him for punching on his face and will beat him hard. This is the example of frustration-aggression theory.
Answer:
the correct answer is C. judicial independence
Explanation:
judicial independence is the concept that the judiciary should be independent from the other branches of government. That is, courts should not be subject to improper influence from the other branches of government or from private or partisan interests.
judicial independence is also the ability of courts and judges to perform their duties free of influence or control by other actors, whether governmental or private.
An independent judiciary means a justice system that is not influenced by either the legislative or executive branch. It is free to make decisions based upon law, not upon men or pressure from other groups. An independent judiciary is created to guarantee equal justice to all
Please give a list of choices to pick from.
Answer:
bulimia nevosa
Explanation:
Bulimia nevosa is a term that describes a form of severe eating disorder in which an individual eat huge quantities of food and then purge to get rid of extra calories. Research has shown that it affects individuals in late childhood or early adulthood, and common to female gender than male.
Hence, in this case, it can be concluded that Sara most likely suffers from BULIMIA NEVOSA.
Answer:
The conflict theorist would argue from the point of view of the society being in perpetual competition as a result of inequality of distribution of resources and power. The rich would not pave the way for cheaper technology as a result of them purchasing early version of expensive technologies but rather, everyone would aspire to be the first to buy such early version of technology due to prestige associated with it.
On the long run, the conflict theorists makes more sense due to the fact that, as more people aspire to buy the early version of technologies, it creates extraordinary demand for the goods. this would force the manufacturers to employ more workers inorder to meet up with the demand thereby leading to fall in the prices of such goods. An example is the Toyota brand cars that is popular in some countries.
Explanation: