Answer:
I would say that the best answer to the statement: The tests the trainer gave were intended to measure more than just recall of facts about the book, would be: False.
Explanation:
The example that we are shown here comes from situations that are given in a test that is known as the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Test, and they are intended to measure the capability that a person has to reason, and think critically.
In this case, we would say that the statement is false regarding the case in question, because the trainer issues the tests not to measure either the recall, or the abilities and concepts that the students acquired from the book, but she actually wanted to see if the video format of teaching was actually more efficient than the actual book. Given that this was her intention, to measure the video vs. the book, in achieving her final goal, which was acquirement of skills and concepts on Time Management, her test must have been geared towards that end, and not to simply measure the book´s impact. It was a bonus that afterwards she found that those students who were exposed to the video later on decided to read the book. Given the information on the case itself, we can reason that the answer is false.
Answer:
reverse evacuation
Explanation:
reverse evacuation could be said to be the opposite of evacuation whereby instaed of running outside the building as in the case of evacuation for safety, people run inside the building or remain in the building since it is considered safer than the outside environment.maesures such as lock down, looking for safe locations in the building to hide or take cover are also put in place. Other measures could also be put in place for individuals outside the building
Answer: Two years ago Sean took an <em>intelligence test</em> and earned a score of 99 and recently earned a score of 102. Yet at school Sean earns straight-A grades. The apparent <em>discrepancy</em> between Sean's IQ score and school performance is because <u>Intelligence tests and school grades measure such different abilities that the discrepancy does not require any explanation.</u>
Explanation:
Grading in the school process is a method used to assess and categorize <em>student achievement</em> .
The classification of the IQ is the practice of classifying the score obtained in IQ tests with categorical labels, however it is proven that it <em>is not the only thing that determines the success of a person</em>. The intellectual quotient is an estimator of the general intelligence resulting from some of the standardized tests designed for this purpose. It is considered that the <u>human brain is complex enough to not be able to measure intelligence with a single factor</u>. The standard IQ test measures how smart a person is, traditionally, based on math or language. <u>All other areas </u>in which a person can excel or have natural capacity <u>are not taken into consideration</u>.
Answer: Low in Uncertainty Avoidance
Explanation:
Hofstede argued that different societies had different tolerance levels and that their tolerance levels usually show themselves in certain ways.
Uncertainty Avoidance is one of those days and measures the degree to which a society avoids risky ventures. A society HIGH in Uncertainty Avoidance will seek to avoid risky ventures and sometimes even enact legislature against it. A society LOW in Uncertainty Avoidance will accept risky ventures which can sometimes correspond with innovative, and deviant behavior.
Answer:
Jack is making a(n) internal attribution, while Jill is making a(n) external attribution.
Explanation:
The attribution theory in psychology explains people try to make sense of a behavior or event by assigning causes to it. When we say Jack is making an internal attribution, that means he thinks the cause for an event results from the involved person's personality, ability, skills, efforts, moods, etc. In other words, he somewhat blames the person for his own behavior. On the other hand, when we say Jill is making an external attribution, that means he explains the cause as a matter of luck. He understands the possibility of interference by other people or the environment, etc.
