answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vanyuwa [196]
1 year ago
6

What are the areas of focus in Catton's analysis of the two generals? While both are drastically different, Catton observes some

unifying qualities. What are they?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Dima020 [189]1 year ago
8 0

Answer: Catton's analysis on the two generals (General Grant and General Lee) focused on their contrasts and similarities.

Explanation: Although both generals were on opposing sides and had some fundamental differences, they had many similarities according to Catton's analysis which are:

1. They were both excellent fighters

2. Both have similar fighting techniques and qualities

3. Both were determined and loyal

4. Both were daring and resourceful

5. After the war, both quickly adjusted to the peace and were instrumental in bringing the two factions together quickly to form a unified nation.

You might be interested in
I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST Read the passage. It remains to be explained why Ötzi's maternal lineage [mother’s family line] has disap
pshichka [43]

Answer:

I think the central idea of the passage is that the family Otzi's father is common in Europe.

Explanation:

My justification for my answer is that his DNA kind of matched the one of the people living in the Neolithic Age. This shows that maybe he was a descendant of those people.

I think the first answer is wrong because people of the Neolithic Age were from the past and I don't think DNA existed by then.

And the think the second is wrong because his mother's family was just rare it wasn't complex.

Finally the last is wrong because the DNA wasn't so hard to test it was also easy to compare it because there were other samples to be compared with.

That leaves us with the last answer as correct.

HOPE IT HELPED

3 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
A researcher is looking at the effect of drinking alcohol on the ability to play darts. Half of the participants drink a pint of
deff fn [24]

Answer:

Independent variable is the amount of alcohol drunk. Dependent variable is the 3 dart score.  

Explanation:

            In psychology, an independent variable is a variable that can not be measured by the experimenter or the researcher. It can only be manipulated or can be controlled by the researcher.

            Whereas a dependent variable is the variable which can be measured by the person dong the study.

            Here, since the experimenter can not control the amount of alcohol taken by the participants, thus the the amount of alcohol drunk is the independent variable. While the 3 darts that can be measured by the experimenter is considered as the dependent variable.

Hence the answer is ---

Independent variable is the amount of alcohol drunk. Dependent variable is the 3 dart score.

8 0
1 year ago
The high levels of obedience in the milgram experiments are least likely to be attributable to
Afina-wow [57]

The factor which as very unlikely to have influenced the high levels of obedience observed in the Milgram is an aspect of gender-related behavior found only in males. Factors such as the instruction of a perceived authority figure, putting the ‘teacher’ and ‘learner’ in different rooms, a steady increase of shock level were more likely to have influenced the observed level of obedience.

4 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
why are the Social Service organisation taken as the driving force of social transformation give reason​
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

Explanation:

<u>Social service organizations are the ones that are most likely to detect the problem in society and analyze how it should be approached.</u> They will see what are the priorities of the community, what can be approved, and what are the actions that need to take place in order for a certain problem to be solved.

<u>Organizations know the governmental, civil, and law procedures that need to take place to make the change.</u> <u>They usually already have some support of governmental bodies, employees, and volunteers who can work on the issue. </u>

Therefore, social service organizations are more likely to get into the process of solution and guide the social transformation through it.

8 0
2 years ago
ears after you win the lottery, a friend in another country calls to ask your advice. By wild coincidence, she has just won anot
Otrada [13]

Most lotteries allow the winner to take a lump sum or an annuity. The lump sum is a single cash transfer whereas the annuity is a series of annual payments. Most lottery winners, if given the choice, take the lump sum payment. They want all of the money immediately, and that is the main advantage. You have full and complete access to the money. The lump sum payment can have disadvantages, however.

First, if your lottery prize is less than $10 million, you may be in a better income tax position if you receive the proceeds over several years via an annuity rather than up front. Why? Lottery wins are subject to income tax in the year you receive the money. If you take the lump sum option, the entire $10 million is subject to income tax that year. However, if you choose the annuity option, the payments could come to you over several decades. For example, instead of $10 million of income in one year, your annuity payment might be $300,000 a year. Although the $300,000 would be subject to income tax, it would keep you out of the highest state and federal income tax brackets. (In fact, the 2018 tax brackets allow individuals to have  an income of $500,000 a year – and those who are married filing jointly, $600,000 – and still be in the 35%, rather than 37% bracket.)

Second, I strongly believe that for certain people who are more prone to spending, won’t get help from advisors and/or have certain familial pressures, the lump sum option can create more problems. There are lots of lottery winners who you never hear about who do just fine, but there are others who ruin their finances, relationships and lives after they win. For them, having less access to the full amount of the win is better. Instead of having to manage $15 million, they may be much better at managing $800,000 a year.

The annuity is not as cool as a big check, but I’ve never heard anyone complain about receiving a check in the mail every year.

3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Seventeen-year-old lynette has stopped hanging out with her friends, tells her mother she is eating her meals in her room while
    10·2 answers
  • Imagine this scenario in a play:camilo is minding the neighbor's indoor cat while the neighbors are on vacation. but he can't fi
    11·2 answers
  • _____ is an individual's fast-acting, self-fulfilling fear of being judged based on a negative idea about his or her group.
    15·1 answer
  • Directions: find the next five terms, then write a conjecture. 1. 13, 18, 23, 28, _______, _______, _______, _______, _______ co
    13·2 answers
  • Verlin worked in a cabinet shop until he became frustrated that his ideas for improving efficiency were falling on deaf ears. so
    9·1 answer
  • Your instructor tells your class that you are all participating in a study on the effectiveness of note-taking in class. The res
    14·1 answer
  • What are the justifications representative Davis gives regarding the dangers of Chinese immigration?
    12·1 answer
  • If the government initiates an expansionary monetary policy at the same time that its budget deficit increases, then the interes
    8·1 answer
  • For the following questions, assume the following page access pattern: A P R O P E R C O P P E R C O F F E E P O T Assume you st
    7·1 answer
  • Where would be the best place for scientists to conduct experiments to search for fresh drinking water?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!