Answer:
She recommends the possibility that she was not the sort of an individual who might exploit the encounters others had.
Clarification:
She figures an individual can love depression and can learn new things all alone, regardless of whether they are in a reasonable.
Goodbye To All That is a remarkable short story composed by Joan Didion. In this story, she expounds on her life in New York. She is just twenty years old. She specifies everything about her sentiments, feelings and life occasions in this story. She likewise depicts the decisions she has made in her life and their result.
<u>Answer:</u>
Based on the excerpt, the most reasonable plot prediction is that (A) Farquhar may unknowingly walk into a trap.
<u>Explanation:</u>
“An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” by “Ambrose Bierce” is a story set during American Civil War. The soldier had disguised himself and he was a scout. Gradually in the story we come to know that 'Farquhar' had been set up through a tricky play. So, the correct option is option A.
Farquhar is a supporter of confederate. Thinking that the soldier that came is confederate he informed about the movements of the Union soldiers, thinking Confederate could win the war with this information. But the 'Confederate soldier' was a Union soldier in disguise.
The lines that foreshadow Tybalt's death are:
Capulet: [to Tybalt] You are a saucy boy – is 't so indeed? – /
This trick may chance to scathe you. Tybalt: I will withdraw; but this intrusion shall /
Now seeming sweet convert to bitter gall. Benvolio: Tybalt, the kinsman of old Capulet, /
Hath sent a letter to his father’s house. . . . [Romeo] will answer the letter’s master, how he dares, being dared. Mercutio: More than prince of cats, I can tell you. O! [Tybalt] is the courageous captain of compliments.
The schoolhouse reveals that the story takes place in the distant past because it is the only one for all the island's students
Hope this helps!
Answer: to reveal that dictators manipulate others and use deception to further their ambitions.
Explanation:
Orwell's main purpose in this passage is to reveal that dictators manipulate others and use deception to further their ambitions.
Despite the famine and the food situation, Napoleon was well aware of the bad results that might follow if the real facts of the food situation were known, and therefore he decided to make use of Mr. Whymper to spread a contrary impression. This showed that he deceived others.
