The correct answer is B) guilt is the only force that compels us to act morally.
It has been argued by social learning theorists that guilt is important for learning the boundaries of socially acceptable behavior and acting in such a way. Some argue that is it the only motivator for moral behavior.
Answer:
d. reinforcement
Explanation:
Reinforcement: In psychology, the term reinforcement refers to the phenomenon of strengthening of a particular stimulus to increase the probability or likelihood of a particular response.
Example: A girl gets a new dress whenever she performs well in her studies.
Reinforcement is of two different types including the negative reinforcement and the positive reinforcement.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the reinforcement.
Answer: Indulgent
Explanation:
Indulgent parenting is one of the parenting style where the parents are attached with their child but they also know that how to control them on their high and unnecessary demands.
It is also known as permissive parenting and it is basically define by psychologist as the form of parenting style.
According to the given situation, Ashley and their parents have very friendly relationship with each other and they describe about the indulgent parenting style.
According to the given description, Ron is a laggard.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
Every individual in this world has a unique personality. Some people adapt and learn quickly whereas others are slow in learning and changing their behavior according to the surrounding. In the present situation, Ron is a laggard as he is very slow in adopting new ideas.
He is not very comfortable in changing what and how he thinks about any product or idea. He lacks a progressive attitude and that is a reason why people fall behind others in their lives when they resist any change.
Were the Founding Fathers justified in rebelling against the British government and declaring independence?:
The colonists were justified in rebelling against the British due to several reasons, a large part being Locke's reasoning. The colonists also stated that due to the acts and the manners he committed them, they would write up a series of complaints which would stand as the pinnacle of the declaration of independence.
In a well-developed essay that includes an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, explain whether or not the Founding Fathers were justified in declaring independence.:
During the years 1740 to 1770 the strain between England and therefore the 13 colonies grew into a full scale war. tormented by unjust taxation and tyrannical rule, the colonists tried to alter and influence English people policy through repeated petitioning and boycotts. After failing to influence England through peaceful measures, war was the colonists’ only option. The 13 colonies were therefore justified in starting a revolt against England. in line with England however the colonists weren't justified in waging war. England was the native land and therefore the colonists paid very cheap taxes within the world. Being that the colonists benefited from the French and Indian war, colonial help in return the debt was expected. The 13 colonies unnecessarily resorted to violence and propaganda within which a minority of Patriots influenced other colonists to believe a “New England” problem. Despite England’s reasons on why the 13 colonies were wrong to declare war, the colonists were justified in waging war. The colonists within the Declaration of Independence clearly stated their grievances and case against England, declaring to the planet the explanations that caused them to separate and fight to become the us of America.
