Answer:
Explanation:
A) using 2-year moving average :
Year 6 : (3800 + 3700) = 7500 / 2 = 3750
2) Mean absolute deviation based on the forecast above :
(3000 + 4000) = 7000/2 = 3500
(4000 + 3400) = 7400/2 = 3700
(3400 + 3800) = 7200/2 = 3600
3000
4000
3400 __3500__100
3800__3700__100
3700__3600__100
Mean absolute deviation = (100 + 100 + 100) /3 = 300/3 = 100
C) weight of 0.4 and 0.6
(0.4*3000 + 0.6*4000) = 3600
(0.4*4000 + 0.6*3400) = 3640
(0.4*3400 + 0.6*3800) = 3640
3000
4000
3400 __3600__200
3800__3640__160
3700__3640__60
(200 + 160 + 60) = 420 / 3 = 140
Answer:
Option B. Demand conditions
Explanation:
The demand conditioning is the domestic demand of the product that forms greater impact on the demand and innovation of the product in its domestic market. This great domestic demand of Fuji film products stipulated greater innovation which not only differentiated the product but also increased the demand in other markets like US and Europe.
This increased Demand conditions enabled the company to gain competitive advantage.
Calculating average cost of steak initially when only 5000 pounds was produced
Average cost= 50000/5000
AC= 10$
Now when 1 pound is added only 9$ is added in total cost so marginal cost
MC= 9$
From above calculations we can see that AC>MC
so we can say that the average cost of production is greater than marginal cost so it will be beneficial to produce more
Answer:
The answer is National Labor Relations Act (Wagner Act)
Explanation:
The national labor Act of 1935 provides workers with the right to organize and join labor union. The Act also provides workers with a framework for collective bargaining. The Wagner Act prohibits the interference or coercion of workers to exercise their rights of organizing or joining labor unions alongside bargaining collectively for their working conditions or wages.
Moreover, the Act prohibits the employer from the refusal to bargain with employees' representatives.
<span>Answer:
At what unit sales level would WCC have the same EPS, assuming it undertakes the investment and finances it with debt or with stock? {Hint: V = variable cost per unit = $8,160,000/440,000, and EPS = [(PQ - VQ - F - I)(1 - T)]/N. Set EPSStock = EPSDebt and solve for Q.} Round your answer to the nearest whole.
units
At what unit sales level would EPS = 0 under the three production/financing setups - that is, under the old plan, the new plan with debt financing, and the new plan with stock financing? (Hint: Note that VOld = $10,200,000/440,000, and use the hints for Part b, setting the EPS equation equal to zero.) Round your answers to the nearest whole.
Old plan units
New plan with debt financing units
New plan with stock financing units
On the basis of the analysis in parts a through c, and given that operating leverage is lower under the new setup, which plan is the riskiest, which has the highest expected EPS, and which would you recommend? Assume here that there is a fairly high probability of sales falling as low as 250,000 units, and determine EPSDebt and EPSStock at that sales level to help assess the riskiness of the two financing plans. Round your answers to two decimal places.
EPSDebt = $
EPSStock = $</span>
