Answer:
c. color constancy
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the term that best explains this phenomenon is called color constancy. This term refers to a feature of the human color perception system in which individuals perceive a color of something as constant regardless of the changing illumination conditions of the environment. Such is the case in this scenario since you perceive your friends shirt as red, regardless of the lighting in the room.
Answer:
oo
Explanation:
dahil Ito Ang paraan ng pakikipag usap at sa pakikipag usap tayo at magkakaisa at sa panahong tayoy magkakaisa magkakaroon ng kaunlaran sa ating bayan at labat tayo at ay sabay sabay na aangat .Kaya napakahalaga ng wika..
follow me
Answer: C. The participants' choice of which class to take
Explanation:
The classes were not arranged in an optional way for the students that enrolled, the best option would be for the director of the fitness team to allow participants choose the class they want to partake in. The best he can do for them is to educate them on the various classes but the enrollment should be basically their choice to make because many or some participants that enrolled may not be happy with his choices for them.
Answer: correlation vs. causation
Explanation:
Correlation assesses the relationship between variables and can be in the same direction, where the increase in one exists as the same time as an increase in the other variable or inverse where an increase in one variable occurs when there is a decrease in the second variable. However, this correlation does not indicate causation.
Causation signifies that one variable is responsible for the occurrence of an event in the other variable. Clearly, there is no cause and effect between the number of mules and doctorate degrees in a state. Here, there is a correlation but a fundamental causative factor is absent between the two events.
Answer:
1. What does the study say about places that had enough population to be considered metropolis?
2. Was the view expicit enough to make a determination on the general population?
3. Could the determination about autism be caused by diverse age group study in places of high relevance?
4. Were the person's studied being selected from explicitly different areas in the metropolis?
