The lot-for-lot (LFL) rule is best applied when inventory-carrying costs are high.
Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
LFL is Lot for Lot and the lot sizing process, where the system considers the order quantity the net specifications for each period. The approach is intermittently appropriate for expensive things or objects.
The bigger the size of the lot, the higher the overall inventory level and the greater the cost of the inventory. However, the expense of the ordering system is smaller since many items are designated to transport and logistics.
The smaller the lot size, the lower the average inventory level. Instead, the purchasing costs of a unit increase. The size of a batch is the most economical when the overall cost of ordering and inventory transport is minimal.
I believe the correct answer is job performance.
This is because all of those things mentioned above (how much time he spends with his team, his impact on the team, and how well he explains new things) are part of his performance, and based on the effects that this has, his performance will either be considered to be good or bad.
Answer:
The obvious negative consequence of the two examples is that the customer will not be satisfied, while the consequence of the third is the unethical damage done to the employees. In the first example, customer care agents are not focusing on the actual problem, but rather the time invested in handling a call, which is not the crucial KPI.
a. This example could be modified by creating a new KPI, which is not time related. A better KPI would be the <u>number of satisfied customers</u> after reporting a problem. Time should be taken into consideration as a limit when certain complaints take too much time.
b. In this example, the KPI should be sales revenue, not volume. They should focus on enhancing the benefits of products rather than giving large discounts straight ahead. Also, trying to cross-sell to customers even when it is irrelevant (and bothersome) can negatively influence the long-term customer relationship.
c. This is vastly unethical practice to use the low number of injuries as a means of productivity. There are plenty of other more relevant KPIs for bonus eligibility such as the number of produced items in a day, punctuality, manager reference etc. It is understandable that a company wishes to minimize the injuries (as it is a downtime for a worker and reduces overall productivity), but it is not the best way.
Answer:
The correct answer is behaviorally anchored rating scale.
Explanation:
The behavior-based rating scale is a performance appraisal method that combines elements of the traditional rating scale and critical incident methods. In this, various levels of performance are presented along with a scale that describes them regarding the specific work behavior of an employee.
The quantity rose was mostly likely cause
