answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Viefleur [7K]
2 years ago
3

The European system of central​ banks' primary tool for conducting monetary policy is open market operations. It uses this tool

to set the interest rate for very​ short-term interbank​ loans, which is known as​ the:________.
A. target financing rate
B. discount rate
C. overnight cash rate
D. marginal lending rate
Business
2 answers:
muminat2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

C) overnight cash rate

Explanation:

Both the Fed and the European Central Bank use interbank overnight cash rates as their operational target for monetary policy. It basically refers to the interest rate that is charged for overnight unsecured loans between domestic banks, i.e. when banks need some extra cash to cover some immediate issue, they obtain overnight funds that must be returned the next day.

Gre4nikov [31]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The correct answer is C. Overnight cash rate

Explanation:

The one-day rate is the interest rate at which a depository institution (usually banks) lends or borrows funds with another depository institution in the night market. In many countries, the one-day rate is the interest rate established by the central bank to guide monetary policy. In most cases, the one-day rate is the lowest interest rate available and, as such, is only available to the most solvent institutions.

You might be interested in
Jamison Paints makes and sells paint to home improvement stores. Jamison's only plant can produce up to 12 million cans of paint
Olin [163]

Answer:

Jamison's current total cost of making and selling 10 million cans of paint is $75,000,000 and the current cost per can of paint is $7.5

Explanation:

For computing the current total cost, we need to apply the formula which is shown below:

Total cost = Fixed cost + variable cost

where,

Fixed cost = $15,000,000

And, the variable cost = Annual production × variable cost per plant

                                     = 10,000,000 × $6

                                     = $60,000,000

Now put these values to the above formula  

So, the value would equal to

= $15,000,000 + $60,000,000

= $75,000,000

Now the current cost per can of paint would be

= (Total cost) ÷ (Annual production)

= ($75,000,000) ÷ (10,000,000)

= $7.5 per can of paint

3 0
2 years ago
What is the present value of the future cash flows, if you also could earn $110,000 per year rent on the property? The rent is p
dem82 [27]

Answer:

a. The present value of the sales price is $1.657 million.

b. No. This is because an investment in the property will result in a negative net present value (NPV) of $0.443 million.

c-1. The present value of the future cash flows is $2.122 million.

c-2. Yes. Yes. This is because an investment in the property will result in a positive net present value (NPV) of $0.022 million.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete. The complete question is therefore presented before answering the question as follows:

You can buy property today for $2.1 million and sell it in 6 years for $3.1 million. (You earn no rental income on the property.)

a. If the interest rate is 11%, what is the present value of the sales price? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in millions rounded to 3 decimal places.)

b. Is the property investment attractive to you?

c-1. What is the present value of the future cash flows, if you also could earn $110,000 per year rent on the property? The rent is paid at the end of each year. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in millions rounded to 3 decimal places.)

c-2. Is the property investment attractive to you now?

The explanation to the answers is now provided as follows:

a. If the interest rate is 11%, what is the present value of the sales price? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in millions rounded to 3 decimal places.)

The present value of the sales price can be calculated using the simple present value formula as follows:

PV = FV / (1 + r)^n ……………………….. (1)

Where;

PV = Present value of the sales price = ?

FV = Future value or the sales price in 6 years = $3.1 million

r = interest rate = 11%, or 0.11

n = number of years = 6

Substitute the values into equation (1), we have:

PV = $3.1 / (1 + 0.11)^6

PV = $3.1 / 1.11^6

PV = $3.1 / 1.870414552161

PV = $1.65738659187525 million

Rounding to 3 decimal places, we have:

PV = $1.657 million

Therefore, the present value of the sales price is $1.657 million.

b. Is the property investment attractive to you?

No. This is because an investment in the property will result in a negative net present value (NPV) of $0.443 million.

The negative net present value (NPV) of $0.443 million is determined as follows:

NPV = Present value of the sales price - Acquisition cost = $1.657 million - $2.1 million = -$0.443 million

c-1. What is the present value of the future cash flows, if you also could earn $110,000 per year rent on the property? The rent is paid at the end of each year. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in millions rounded to 3 decimal places.)

The present value of the future cash flows can be calculated using the following steps:

<u>Step 1: Calculation of the present value of the $110,000 per year rent</u>

Since the rent is paid at end of each year, this can be calculated using the formula for calculating the present value of an ordinary annuity as follows:

PVR = P * ((1 - (1 / (1 + r))^n) / r) …………………………………. (2)

Where;

PVR = Present value of yearly rent = ?

P = Annual rent =$110,000

r = interest rate = 11%, or 0.11

n = number of years = 6

Substitute the values into equation (2) to have:

PVR = $110,000 * ((1 - (1 / (1 + 0.11))^6) / 0.11)

PVR = $110,000 * 4.23053785373826

PVR = $465,359.163911209

Converting to million and rounded to 3 decimal places, we have:

PVR = $0.465 million

<u>Step 2: Calculation of the present value of the future cash flows</u>

Present value of future cash flows = Present value sales price + Present value of annual rent ……. (3)

Where;

Present value sales price = $1.657 million, as already calculate in part a above

Present value of annual rent = PVR = $0.465 million

Substituting the values into equation (3), we have:

Present value of future cash flows = $1.657 million + $0.465 million = $2.122 million

Therefore, the present value of the future cash flows is $2.122 million.

c-2. Is the property investment attractive to you now?

Yes. This is because an investment in the property will result in a positive net present value (NPV) of $0.022 million.

The positive net present value (NPV) of $0.022 million is determined as follows:

NPV = Present value of tof the future cash flows - Acquisition cost = $2.122 million - $2.1 million = 0.0219999999999998 million

Converting to million and rounded to 3 decimal places, we have:

NPV = $0.022 million

6 0
2 years ago
If Local Co. had an increase in selling expenses of $300,000​, how would that affect each of its​ margins?  ​
wariber [46]

Answer:

D. Selling expenses do not affect the gross​ margin, but the increase in such expenses will decrease the other margins.

Explanation:

As Selling expenses are charged after gross Income or profit. So, it will not effect the gross income / profit. Other margin are calculated after adjusting the selling expenses, so that will be effected. Operating Margin and Net profit margin are both effected by change in the selling expenses.

Following is the Format of income statement

Sales

Less: Cost of Sales

Gross income / Profit

Less: Operating expenses

Admin Expenses

Selling Expenses

Other Expense

Operating Income / Profit

Less: Interest expense

Less: Tax

Net Income / Profit

6 0
2 years ago
Question 6 of 10
Fiesta28 [93]

Answer: A

Explanation: Apex

5 0
2 years ago
A chemical manufacturer is setting up capacity in Europe and North America for the next three years. Annual demand in each marke
Yuri [45]

Answer:

Explanation:

The two choices under consideration are building 4 million units of capacity in North America

YEAR                         1                    2                           3  

Production and Sales 4,000,000.00   4,000,000.00   4,000,000.00  

Variable cost @ 10  40,000,000.00   40,000,000.00   40,000,000.00  

Divide by:

Conversion Factor  1.33                         1.33                     1.33  

Multiply by:

Growth(.1*.5)+(-.05*.5) 1.025                        1.025^2                  1.025^3  

NET CASHFLOWS  30,827,068.00   31,597,744.00   32,387,688.00  

DCF @ 10%     0.909090909           0.83                  0.75  

Present Values  28,024,607.27   26,113,838.02   24,333,349.36  

NET TOTAL COST 78,471,794.65  

or building 2 million units of capacity in each of the two loca-tions. Building two plants will incur an additional one-time cost of $2 million.

YEAR                  0            1                      2                              3  

Production and Sales       4,000,000.00      4,000,000.00   4,000,000.00  

Variable cost @ [(10+9)/2] 38,000,000.00  38,000,000.00   38,000,000.00  

Additional cost  2,000,000.00      

Conversion Factor     1.33     1.33                   1.33                       1.33  

Growth(.1*.5)+(-.05*.5)    1.025               1.025^2              1.025^3  

CASHFLOWS  1,503,759.40  29,285,714.29  30,017,857.00  30,768,304.00  

DCF @ 10%       1           0.909090909    0.826446281 0.751314801  

Present Value 1,503,759.40  26,623,376.62   24,808,146.28   23,116,682.19  

NET TOTAL COST = 76,051,964.50  

DECISION: The manufacturer should build 2 plants in 2 different locations because it gives a lower net present cost

<u>At what initial cost differential from building the two plants will the chemical manufacturer be indifferent between the two options?</u>

The difference in both options came from the fact that variable cost is lower in Europe and building the plant is more expensive. If there is no increase in cost and variable cost is same everywhere, then both options will be same.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • When Coca-Cola carries a different price depending on whether the consumer purchases it in a fine restaurant, a fast-food restau
    9·1 answer
  • A sale transaction on rental property closes on December 10th. The landlord received the December rent of $4,400 on December 1.
    12·1 answer
  • The institution-based view driving alliances and acquisitions focuses on _____ concerns.
    13·1 answer
  • Your firm has decided to localize its products and services to meet local market demands. A good approach to use would be ____ s
    5·1 answer
  • Bracken, Louden, and Menser, who share profits and losses in a ratio of 4:2:2, respectively are partners in a home decorating bu
    12·1 answer
  • The firm is currently in the process of forecasting sales, asset requirements, and required funding for the coming year. In the
    14·1 answer
  • A machine can be purchased for $150,000 and used for five years, yielding the following net incomes. In projecting net incomes,
    15·1 answer
  • Buggy Wars Two friends and neighbours arrange to go into business together and then become bitter rivals: This is the story of B
    7·1 answer
  • Sue now has $125. How much would she have after 8 years if she leaves it invested at 8.5% with annual compounding
    9·1 answer
  • According to this excerpt, what is one major way in which the World Bank differs from a regular bank? The World Bank is a source
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!