Answer:
$74,900
Explanation:
Given that,
Cash = $25,000
Patents, = $7,900
Accounts receivable, = $9,300
Property, plant, and equipment, = $98,700
Prepaid insurance, = $3,600
Accumulated depreciation, = $10,000
Inventory, = $37,000
Retained earnings, = 15,500
Trademarks, = $12,600
Accounts payable, = $8,000
Goodwill, = $11,000
Therefore,
Huron's current assets:
= Cash + Accounts receivable + Prepaid insurance + Inventory
= $25,000 + $9,300 + $3,600 + $37,000
= $74,900
Answer:
The regional aircraft will presumably have a higher break-even point the original investment point than a furniture maker in light of the fact that the majority of a carrier's expenses are fixed . It is imperative to take note of that despite the fact that the two organizations report indistinguishable income and total compensation figures, their equal the initial investment focuses will probably contrast fundamentally due to contrasts in their cost structures.
Sell the asset, which will drive down the price and cause the expected return to reach the level of the required return.
Answer:
Explanation:
a. Total surplus is the area bounded by points a, b, and c. To calculate total surplus, we use the following formula for the area of a triangle: Area = ½ × Base × Height. The area between the demand curve and the supply curve for the quantity ranging from 0 to 20 is the total economic surplus. This is a triangle with a base (best read off the price axis) of $80, which is the price difference at Q = 0, or between points a and c, and a height of 20 (the number of units purchased in equilibrium). Using these values, we have a total surplus of (1/2) × $80 × 20 = $800.
The consumer surplus is the area between the demand curve and the equilibrium price line. Here we have a base of $40 (the price difference between the demand schedule price at Q = 0, which is $85, and the equilibrium price of $45). The height of the triangle is once again 20 (the number of units purchased in equilibrium). Using these values, we have a consumer surplus of (1/2) × 40 × 20 = $400.
b. Deadweight loss is the difference in total surplus between an efficient level of output Q1 and a reduced level of output at Q2. We can calculate this as the area of a triangle bounded by points bde. The base of this triangle is the difference in prices at points d and e, or $55 – $35 = $20. The height of this triangle is given by the difference in the restricted level of output of Q2 = 15 and the efficient level of output Q1 = 20, or 5 units. Thus, the area of this triangle (the deadweight loss) is equal to (1/2) × $20 × 5 = $50. The remaining total surplus can be found by subtracting the deadweight loss from the original (efficient) total surplus. This is $800 (maximum total surplus) – $50 (deadweight loss) = $750.
c. The deadweight loss from overproduction is the difference in total surplus between an efficient level of output Q1 and an additional level of output at Q3. We can calculate this as the area of a triangle bounded by points bfg. The base of this triangle is the difference in prices at points f and g, or $59 – $31 = $28. The height of this triangle is given by the difference in the additional level of output Q3 = 27 and the efficient level of output Q1 = 20, or 7 units. Thus, the area of this triangle (the deadweight loss) is equal to (1/2) × $28 × 7 = $98. The remaining total surplus can be found by subtracting the deadweight loss from the original total surplus. This is $800 (maximum total surplus) – $98 (deadweight loss) = $702. Note here that we maximize total (producer + consumer) surplus by producing the equilibrium quantity, but we lose surplus from overproduction (inefficient use of resources).
Answer:
a. leasing the MOW van
- direct cost to Meals-On-Wheels program
- indirect cost to particular seniors served by the program
- fixed cost with respect to the number of seniors served
b. incidental supplies such as salt, pepper, napkins, and so on
- direct cost to Meals-On-Wheels program
- direct cost to particular seniors served by the program
- variable cost with respect to the number of seniors served
c. gasoline consumed by the MOW van
- direct cost to Meals-On-Wheels program
- indirect cost to particular seniors served by the program
- variable cost with respect to the number of seniors served
d. rent on the facility that houses Care Center, including the MOW
- indirect cost to Meals-On-Wheels program
- indirect cost to particular seniors served by the program
- fixed cost with respect to the number of seniors served
e. salary of the part-time manager of the MOW
- direct cost to Meals-On-Wheels program
- indirect cost to particular seniors served by the program
- fixed cost with respect to the number of seniors served
f. depreciation on the kitchen equipment used in the MOW
- direct cost to Meals-On-Wheels program
- indirect cost to particular seniors served by the program
- fixed cost with respect to the number of seniors served
g. hourly wages of the caregiver who drives the van and delivers the meals
- direct cost to Meals-On-Wheels program
- indirect cost to particular seniors served by the program
- variable cost with respect to the number of seniors served
h. complying with H&S regulations in the kitchen
- direct cost to Meals-On-Wheels program
- indirect cost to particular seniors served by the program
- fixed cost with respect to the number of seniors served
i. mailing letters soliciting donations to the MOW
- direct cost to Meals-On-Wheels program
- indirect cost to particular seniors served by the program
- fixed cost with respect to the number of seniors served
