According to Fyfe and Kane, on-duty abuse is the use of excessive force, psychological abuse, or discrimination.
Option: C
Explanation:
On duty abuse is the use of excessive force, psychological abuse or discrimination. Insult of employee in front of others or discriminate him from others. Simple failure in meet expectation does not lead to on duty abuse. Psychological abuse is very dangerous for a person when they feel ashamed in front of others it hurts them. They feel emotionally broken.
Psychological abuse lowers employee's self esteem, courage. They start to loss their mental peace which is harmful for mental health. Without a healthy environment one can not be a productive employee who will develop company's current economic situation.
I believe the answer is: Spatial intelligence
Spatial intelligence is the part of our intelligence that granted us with the ability to comprehend three dimensional objects. This would determine our ability to solve puzzles, pinpoint object location from different perspective, and ability to understand mechanical process.<span />
Answer and explanation:
the employee might be in fear of the company and therefore reporting what they want the company to hear, this is why menay report that they feel strongly for gender equality and women would say there are gender equality problems know the company. Also the researcher would have also contacted employees who had left the company, and therefore would have unbiased opinions. Thee are possible explanations of the above
.
Answer: An export subsidy achieves cheaper goods in foreign markets while an import tariff makes imported goods more expensive.
Explanation: An export subsidy and an import tariff have different goals. For the domestic market, subsidies reduce the price of domestic goods and tariffs increase the price of foreign goods, making domestic goods more competitive, more desirable and fueling the domestic market.
When an imported good has enjoyed a substantial production subsidy, the price will be so low that tariffs will <u>not</u> prevent it from being sufficiently competitive in the foreign market against their domestic goods. In this case it achieves the same goal as a production subsidy.
Both ideas seem contradictory at first, but are both true.
Answer:
The correct answer would be option B, Pseudo Conflict.
Explanation:
A Pseudo Conflict is a conflict in which the both parties are in an agreement but their misunderstandings and wrong perceptions prevents them from seeing that they are in an agreement.
So while fighting with your newly wed bride, if you say that i don't know why we even got married, we are so different, you are actually demonstrating Pseudo Conflict, because you are still in an agreement which is marriage, but due to your fight, your misunderstandings and wrong perceptions are preventing you to see that you both are in an agreement. This type of conflict can be resolved by simply clarifications of each partner's views.
