CPI is the Consumer Price Index.
CPI is one of the most used statistics.
In 1960 : CPI 29.3 --------------100 %
In 2017 : CPI 255 --------------- x %
-----------------------------------------------------
29.3 : 255 = 100 : x
29.3 x = 25,500
x = 25,500 : 29.3
x = 870.3 %
For $1 million in 1960 there is $8.703 million in 2017.
Answer: The movie star earned $8.703 million in 2017.
Based on the statement above their need to separate the employee first because there is an employee get bonus and dont. so the correct order of steps to determine the significant result are: c. B,E,D,C,A
hope this help
It really depends. If all jobs are similar and demand the same requirements, I would find a middle amount like $25 for all ten workers.
Answer:
b. $3,350,000
Explanation:
<em>Long-Term Liabilities:</em>
Bonds Payable $3,000,000
Notes Payable $165,000
Mortgage Payable $185,000
Total Long Term Liabilities $3,350,000
Full Question:
<em>Suppose it is discovered that the first zurvanites were influenced more by indian than by babylonian conceptions of cyclical time. does this discovery support the author's argument?</em>
A: The author does not claim that Zoroaster was the first to proclaim the end of history, just that this claim was one of the “most striking elements” in his teaching (lines 27-29). This discovery would not be inconsistent with the passage.
B: The author suggests that the Zurvanite conception of time as a sentient being was based in Babylonian speculations that time is cyclical, and so unending (lines 29-35). An early Zurvanite denial that history has an end (i.e., a claim that history and time do not end) would strengthen, not weaken the author’s argument.
C: The author very strongly argues that the Zurvanites committed “a deep and grievous heresy” by claiming that the two primal beings were brothers (lines 52-56). If Zoroaster himself made this claim, the Zurvanites would not in fact have “betrayed Zoroaster’s fundamental doctrine.”
D: The author does not argue that Zoroaster had no premonitory inkling of what heresies were to come. This discovery would have no effect on the author’s position.
Answer:
Yes. The author very strongly argues that the Zurvanites committed “a deep and grievous heresy” by claiming that the two primal beings were brothers (lines 52-56). If Zoroaster himself made this claim, the Zurvanites would not in fact have “betrayed Zoroaster’s fundamental doctrine.”
Cheers!
