Answer:
Janine is an accountant who makes $30,000 a year. Robert is a college student who makes$8,000 a year. All other things equal, who is more likely to stand in a long line to get a cheap concert ticket?
Robert; his opportunity cost is lower
Explanation:
Robert has loss of potential gain from the alternative available, his low income will made him to queue in order to get the concert ticket
Answer:
18.37%
Explanation:
The internal rate of return is the return at which the net present value comes to zero
Here the net present value is the value at which the present cash inflows after discounting factor is exceeded then the initial investment. If this thing happens then the project would be accepted otherwise it would be rejected
The computation of the range of the plant IRR is to be shown in the attachment below.
Please find the attachmentHence, the internal rate of return is 18.37%
Answer:
Joint Venture
Explanation:
The reason is that in a joint venture, two or more than two companies form a partnership aggrement to achieve the combined objectives in a limited time constraint. The companies gain synergy in achieving that combined objective which is all because of the pooling of resources of the venturing organization. Here is the similar case. Three organization here had formed a contract and agreed to pool their resources to achieve a combined objective. Once this objective is achieved the partnership (Joint Venture) will be dissolved.
Answer:
the most spend on research will be $12,000
Explanation:
given data
earn = 2% more
trading costs = 0.5%
stock portfolio = $800,000
solution
we know that here net earnings due to research is expected is
net earnings due to research = 2% - 0.5 % = 1.5 % of stock portfolio
so
spend on research is = 1.5 % of stock portfolio
spend on research is = $800,000 × 1.5%
spend on research is = $12,000
so here when we spend more than $12,000 it end up in a net loss
so the most spend on research will be $12,000
Answer:
The correct answer is B. Consumers will be unable to buy all the gas they want at the temporary price ceiling price.
Explanation:
At the time that the offer is recent for price control, demand can be stimulated by the existence of a more reasonable and affordable price for the consumer, so that there is an excess of demand against supply, which is It would imply that it should result in an increase in prices that should lead to an optimum level or breakeven point being reached at any given time, a situation that will not occur precisely because of price control.
By resenting the offer while increasing demand, despite the possible shortage, this shortage does not result in a price increase that would be normal, precisely due to the hand of the state that prevents free market development , since it restricts one of the factors that energizes it, which is the price.
The price of goods and services, as well as can increase or decrease the supply, can also increase or decrease demand, a game that alone should maintain a price that satisfies both consumers and producers, but when price control is introduced , only consumers will be satisfied, a situation that causes bidders to stop producing.
