D. You're going to need another blanket when you go camping.
The statement that best explains the role of the tragic hero archetype in literature is the second one: the tragic hero’s role is to experience a downfall due to a personal flaw.
Aristotle describes the role of the tragic hero in his<em> Poetics</em>. He states that<u> the tragic hero is the main character of a tragedy, which also experiences a change of fortune from good to bad</u>. For that reason, he is the one whom the audience ends up feeling pity for. According to Aristotle, <u>this reversal of fortune is caused by a flaw in the character of the tragic hero</u>. <em>Hamartia</em> is another term used to refer to the main character's error. Two characters that can be considered tragic heroes are Oedipus and Creon, which are part of Sophocles' plays.
Answer:
The meaning of the poem "The Choice" is that the narrator is describing two men one rich and one poor man. The rich man offers an expensive dresses to make her look like a queen but the poor man actually cares about her. She picks the poor man. by dorothy parker
or the choice by Robert morgan
Sometime in the second half of the 21st Century, when the earth was almost destroyed, a spacecraft visits an abandoned city between two hills. In it are captain Starglyn and Suncon, the Celestial Geologist. They are studying the possible causes of the destruction of this city. Having studied a meteorite that broke away from the earth in 2048, Suncon has learnt that men on the earth had themselves caused their end. Even though men knew they were destroying the earth by polluting, cutting down forests and emitting dangerous gases, they didn’t stop such activities. They knew what was right and what was evil, but, fools, they chose the evil way. Two aliens, Starglyn and Suncon, landed on a stretch of meadow between two hills that face a crumbling city. The city was once a prosperous one but over population and overconsumption of natural resources brought decay to the city. All died, man and animal. The city was rendered lifeless.
Explanation:
I didn't know which the choice you meant so I wrote both The second one you probably have to put in your own words tho.
Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>
