The correct matches are as follows:
1. FREE WRITING: Writing down first thoughts on a topic in a timed session, without pausing to check for relevance or grammar.
Brain storming is the process by which creative ideas and solutions are generated via intensive group discussion. There are lots of techniques that can be used during brain storming sessions and three of them are pre writing, clustering and three perspectives.
Free writing is a pre-writing method that involves continuous writing of thoughts and ideas for a set period of time without any regard for spelling, grammar, logical procession, punctuation, or structure; during this time one allow his thoughts to flow freely. Free writing produces the raw materials that are used for developing usable ideas.
Pre writing is very useful in helping one to put down ideas that one has not considered previously.
2. CLUSTERING: Connecting ideas for a topic using different shapes and color-coding to identify how the ideas are related.
Clustering is another technique that is used during brain storming session. It involves writing down keywords or phrases that are relevant to one’s topic of interest and using drawn lines to identify the connections that exist among them. This method allows one to brainstorm in a visual manner.
3. THREE PERSPECTIVES: Describing the topic, tracing its history, and examining its connections with related topics.
Three perspectives is another method that is used during brain storming session. Considering a thing from three different sides help one to see it more completely and clearly. This method involves answering questions for each of the three perspectives considered and then looking for relationship or differences that exist among them. To do this, one has to describe the topic in detail, trace the history of the topic and find out how the topic relate to others.
When going on a bike tour, make sure to bring some water and plan how far you are going, where you will stop, and where to place your bike. You don’t want anyone stealing your bike.
PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!!
I think it is c. I remember Reading this story last year in my freshman English class
One way to fix that sentence is to switch around the two phrases used; 'My mother and father are both scientists' and 'It must have been my destiny to become interested in biology.'
It must have been my destiny to spark an interest in Biology, as my mother and father are both scientists.
That's a way to fix that sentence used in your question.
Also, 'destiny' was spelled incorrectly.
This sentence may seem run on if you don't place a conjunction between the two phrases, or if the phrases are not switched.
If the sentence is to be used with a conjunction, it may end up like this....
My mother and father are both scientists, so it must have been my destiny to become interested in biology.
Or, you may just use a period, to change the two phrases used into two separate sentences.
Like this;
My mother and father are both scientists. For that reason, it must have been my destiny to become interested in biology.
ALSO, as you can see above, I have added a few words to the last sentence. Those three words, 'For that reason', give closure to the two sentences.
Hope this helped!
I see you have already provided an answer. I will, however, develop it further.
Answer and Explanation:
<u>The external events in "The Most Dangerous Game", a short story by Richard Connell, affect an internal change within the main character, Sanger Rainsford. </u>Rainsford is a famous hunter, who also happens to be quite arrogant about his luck and position in life. He does not care about what <u>the animals </u>he hunts feel. <u>Rainsford is unable to empathize with their fear.</u> According to him, the world is divided into hunters and huntees, and he is lucky to belong to the former instead of the latter.
However, Rainsford's luck changes drastically once he accidentally lands on General Zaroff's island. Zaroff, like Rainsford, is a hunter incapable of empathy for his prey. The difference lies in the fact that the general has grown tired of hunting irrational beasts. He now hunts man. And since Rainsford sees this as murder and refuses to hunt alongside him, Zaroff decides to make Rainsford his new prey.
<u>Of course this conflict is bound to cause Rainsford to change internally. Just like an animal, Rainsford is at a disadvantage. He does not possess a gun, while Zaroff carries one and uses hound dogs to help him in his hunt. Rainsford is now no different than one of the beasts he used to hunt. Fear of death is what drives him - the basic instinct to survive that every single animal in the world has. </u>
<u>Of course, Rainsford is a human being. He is rational and intelligent enough to find a way to beat Zaroff. Still, until that happens, he suffers the agony of having to run for his life, to hide in fear. The external event of becoming a prey certainly changes Rainsford into a man capable of empathizing.</u>
