Answer:
hope it helps..
Explanation:
Nepalese art are influenced by their religion and they follow Buddhist tradition through different art forms. You can find different Nepalese artifcats that depict the different characters of Buddha and you can also find some rich sources of Vedas and puranas through such art forms.
Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
Answer:
A. Selective.
Explanation:
This could be looked at in the sense of a little disorder from little Andrew, though the act is selective, it could also come up as mutuism. Some adults with selective mutism are fully capable of speech and understanding language but are physically unable to speak in certain situations, though speech is expected of them.
The behaviour may be perceived as shyness or rudeness by others. A child with selective mutism may be completely silent at school for years but speak quite freely or even excessively at home. There is a hierarchical variation among people with this disorder: some people participate fully in activities and appear social but do not speak, others will speak only to peers but not to adults, others will speak to adults when asked questions requiring short answers but never to peers, and still others speak to no one and participate in few, if any, activities presented to them.
There are two main reason why ti took Magellan that long:
- First, he had to face the scrutiny that initiated by the spanish captain in his ship, so he had to waste several days in dealing with it
- second, the strait pathways is far more treacherous that what Magellan had imagined, making it really hard to navigate the ship.
Answer: This is how each person will be charged:
Principal = Harold
Accomplice=Marci
Accessory before the fact = Carl
Accessory after the fact=Shawn, David
Explanation:
Principal :
Is the person who commit the actual crime , Harold is the one who went inside and cracked the safe hence he is the one who commited the actual crime.
Accomplice:
This is the person who assists someone to commit a crime , Marci drove the van to the place where Harold will commit this crime so she provided him with the transport to go and commit burglary and she is the one who helped Harold get away .
Accessory before the fact:
This is a charge given to someone who encourages ,counsels and aids someone to commit a crime eventhough this person will not be physcally there at the scene. Carl is the one who told them where the vault is located which encouraged them more to commit this crimes because they were equipped with knowledge.
accessory after the fact
This is a charge given to someone who helps a person who has committed a crime eventhough they were also not there at the scene. Shawn is told by Harold that him and merci have commited burglary but he decided to help him get away instead of reporting the crime. David saw the crime being commited but still didn't say a thing to the police.