Answer:
Yes, in the question there are is a clear example of economic discrimination.
Explanation:
The fact that Sharna does not purchase Earth prodcuts is not economic discrimination because each consumer is free to decide what to purchase.
However, Sharna is not only a consumer, but also a producer, and one that is a monopoly, and using the power of her monopolistic position to refuse to sell to Earthlings, or loan less to Earthlings, not because of legitimate economic justifications or concerns, but because she dislikes Earthling poetry, is a clear example of economic discrimination that would be struck down in an Earthling court.
Answer:
The adjusting entry at the end of January:
Debit Unearned revenue: $480
Credit Revenue: $480
Explanation:
When recceived $600 on January 15 from customer, the company must record:
Debit Cash: $600
Credit Unearned revenue: $600
because all lessons are not provided by the company, the company can't recording revenue.
On January 31, the company provided 8 lessons, so the company must recording revenue for these lesson (8x$60=$480) by adjusting entry.
Answer:
4.96%
Explanation:
In order to determine the component after-tax cost of debt first we need to compute the before tax cost of debt by applying the RATE formula which is to be shown in the attachment below:
Given that,
Present value = $1,155
Future value or Face value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 8.25% ÷ 2 = $41.25
NPER = 40 years × 2 = 80 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after applying the above formula
1. The pretax cost of debt is 3.54% × 2 = 7.08%
2. And, the after tax cost of debt would be
= Pretax cost of debt × ( 1 - tax rate)
= 7.08% × ( 1 - 0.30)
= 4.96%
Answer:
a. Merina's captal is $160,000. Half would be $80,000.
Entry;
DR Merina, Capital ..................................................................$80,000
CR Wayne, Capital ....................................................................................$80,000
(To record purchase of half of Merina Capital)
b.
DR Cash......................................................................$180,000
CR Wayne, Capital.........................................................................$180,000
(To record Wayne investment)
<u>Working</u>
The current Capital amount is;
= 200,000 +160,000
= $360,000
If Wayne joins and adds to this such that he owns 1/3 then;
2/3x = 360,000
x = 360,000/2/3
x = $540,000
Wayne's share would be;
= 1/3 * 540,000
= $180,000
Answer: B. Yes, because he kept the car for six months after reaching the age of majority.
Explanation:
When the teenager had not reached the age of majority, holding him liable for the contract would have been challenging. The teenager however reached the age of majority he became legally liable for decisions and contracts.
After this age, he had the car for 6 more months which means that he had accepted the contract as an adult. He cannot therefore simply wiggle out of the payment because he signed an enforceable contract.
