I believe the answer is: <span>slippery slope Fallacy
</span><span>slippery slope Fallacy Refers to an argument that sounded correct intially, but often exaggerated to make a minor event appear to be causing consequences that way bigger than it actually does. </span>We can is this in Jill exaggeration on what the human cloning would do without providing a slightest evidence on her conclusion.
Entering a church service and seeing someone selling hot dogs and cotton candy from a cart near the altar would be perceived as a violation of <u>scene schema.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
A scene schema has prior information about the objects and the spatial relations that are likely to be found in a particular scene. The knowledge about what is contained in the particular scene is known as scene schema.
Scene schema can be best explained with the following scene:
If you are entering a church service and seeing someone selling hot dogs and cotton candy from a cart near the altar. It would be perceived as a violation of scene schema.
I would support that decision.
At that time napoleon took the role as the leader of the farm, he never want to be held responsible for his mistakes and would always blame them to Snowball. But despite all that, Snowball still showed great loyalty to the farm and he also showed admirable bravery when the farm went to war.
