Answer:
$131,000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount of quick assets is shown below:
Quick asset = Account Receivable + Cash + marketable securities
= $65,000 + $30,000 + $36,000
= $131,000
We simply added the account receivable, cash and the marketable securities so that the quick assets could come plus it contains more liquidity that converted into cash in a very short period of time and the rest of the items are ignored as there are not relevant
Answer:
4,712 fingerlings
Explanation:
The amount that a sum will accumulate to at the end of a particular number of period if it grows at a certain rate per annum is given as
F= A× (1+g)^(n)
F- Sum at the end of the period, A- sum at the beginning of the period, n- number of period, g -growth rate
5,000= A× (1.02)^(3)
a= 5000/(1.02^3)
a= 4711.61
The population at the start of fingerlings = 4,712
Explanation:
Income Elasticity of Demand(IED)= Percentage change in quantity demanded/ Percentage change in income
-Percentage change in Q:
%Change in quantity demanded= (q2-q1/q1) = (10-8)/8= 0.25
-Percentage change in Income:
%Change in income= (i2-i1/i1) = (4,500-4,000)/4,000= 0.125
IED= 0.25/0.125= 2
This indicates that the Shaffers are very sensitive to changes in income when it comes to eating out. Which means that changes in income will change significantly the number of times they eat out.
2. Restaurant meals are normal goods, in this case, because when income rises, they ate more in restaurants, then the units consumed for this good increase too.
Answer:
117,000 adjusted COGS
Explanation:

35,000 + 136,000 = 48,000 + COGS
COGS = 123,000 before adjustment
overapplied overhead for 6,000
This means the applied is higher than actual expenses, the cost is 6,000 lower we must decrease the COGS
123,000 - 6,000 = 117,000 adjusted COGS
Answer:
c. criterion deficiency
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario it seems that the performance management system suffers from Criterion deficiency. This term refers to a company failing to assess one or more very important aspects of the process of job performance appraisal for employees within the company. Such as is the case in this scenario as the company is only looking at the sales revenue and completely ignoring all of the other important factors.