answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
skelet666 [1.2K]
2 years ago
7

Recher Corporation uses part Q89 in one of its products. The company's Accounting Department reports the following costs of prod

ucing the 6,200 units of the part that are needed every year. Per Unit Direct materials$7.60 Direct labor$4.20 Variable overhead$8.30 Supervisor's salary$3.20 Depreciation of special equipment$2.70 Allocated general overhead$1.40 An outside supplier has offered to make the part and sell it to the company for $27.00 each. If this offer is accepted, the supervisor's salary and all of the variable costs, including direct labor, can be avoided. The special equipment used to make the part was purchased many years ago and has no salvage value or other use. The allocated general overhead represents fixed costs of the entire company. If the outside supplier's offer were accepted, only $5,000 of these allocated general overhead costs would be avoided. In addition, the space used to produce part Q89 could be used to make more of one of the company's other products, generating an additional segment margin of $15,600 per year for that product. Required: a. Prepare a report that shows the financial impact of buying part Q89 from the supplier rather than continuing to make it inside the company. b. Which alternative should the company choose
Business
1 answer:
DedPeter [7]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Recher Corporation:

a) Financial impact of buying part Q89:

i) Relevant costs for In-house production of part Q89 are the avoidable costs:

Direct materials - $7.60

Direct labour - $4.20

Variable overhead - $8.30

Supervisor's salary $3.20

Avoidable general overhead - $0.81

Avoidable cost = $24.11 per unit

Total = $24.11 x 6,200 = $149,482

ii) Relevant cost of buying outside equals outside price minus additional segment savings = (6,200 x $27) - $15,600 = $151,800

When i) is compared with ii), it shows that it would cost more to buy outside ($151,800) than to produce the part in-house ($149,482).

b) The alternative the company should choose is to produce in-house.

Explanation:

a) The avoidable general overhead of $0.81 was obtained by dividing $5,000 of general overhead by 6,200 units, i.e. $5,000 / 6,200.

b) The depreciation for the special equipment is not included as it is not relevant.  It must be incurred no matter the option chosen.

c) The relevant cost of buying the part outside was reduced by $15,600 since this amount would be realized as additional margin with the choice.

d) |n making cost decisions, relevant and avoidable costs are considered.  Any cost that will be incurred notwithstanding the choice made is not relevant.  Such costs are unavoidable.  For example, the depreciation on the equipment.

You might be interested in
Assume there is a fixed exchange rate between the Canadian and U.S. dollar. The expected return and standard deviation of return
Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

standard deviation = 15.21%

so correct option is B. 15.21%

Explanation:

given data

expected return US = 18%

standard deviation of return US = 15%

expected return canadian = 13%

standard deviation of return canadian = 20%

covariance of returns = 1.5 %

to find out

standard deviation of return

solution

standard deviation is find here as given formula that is

standard deviation = \sqrt{w1^2*\sigma_1^2 + w2^2*\sigma_2^2 + 2*w1*w2*convariance}     ................1

here w1 is amount invested in US stock and w2 is investment in canada and σ1 is Standard deviation return of US and σ2 is Standard deviation return of canada

put here value in equation 1 we get

standard deviation = \sqrt{0.50^2* 0.15^2 + 0.50^2* 0.20^2 + 2*0.50*0.50*0.015}

solve it we get

standard deviation =  0.1520690

standard deviation = 15.21%

so correct option is B. 15.21%

7 0
2 years ago
Which statement about depreciation is​ false? A. Depreciation is a process of allocating the cost of an asset to expense over it
tatyana61 [14]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "D": Depreciation should not be recorded in years in which the market value of the asset has increased.

Explanation:

Depreciation indicates how much the value of the asset has been used. It also aims to match the cost of the asset to the income that the asset helps the company to earn. Used as an income tax deduction, the depreciation calculation provides businesses with an annual allowance for the use and deterioration of tangible assets such as machinery, equipment, and buildings.

<em>Depreciation is recorded throughout all the useful life of an asset until its disposal.</em>

8 0
2 years ago
Explain how each of the five pillars of sustainable change could be applied to sustain the learning organization environment of
Vanyuwa [196]

Answer:

Following are the five pillars of sustainable change could be applied to sustain the learning organization environment of the company:

1) Leadership

2) Strategy

3) Culture

4) Structure

5) System

Explanation:

1) Leadership

Leadership provides the way forward for sustainable change i.e. they show the right direction to their employees . They will develop strategies to keep the momentum going within the learning environment that has now been created. Leadership will coach and mentor individuals, teams, and departments to keep the new systems in alignment and working well together.

2) Strategy

By strategizing means to get positioned itself as a market leader or more customer centric . In order to maintain the competitive edge, development of new learning organizational structure to make good use of all employee knowledge for changes in the market and especially for efficiencies and continuous improvements in operations.

3) Culture

Culture will include the attitude of open communication, a willingness to always be open minded, an encouragement for create thinking and sharing new ideas or conflict, and to support the value of lessons learned from mistakes. It will set the tone for the importance of working together toward a common goal, and will be dedicated to recognizing accomplishments to inspire innovation.

4) Structure

Deciding about the best organizational structure, say the flat one. This will allow employees to communicate freely, share knowledge in real time and work and problem solve cross-functionally. Since the company promotes culture that encourages creative thinking, the employees are confident their talents are being used at the highest capacity to support the company’s drive for continuous improvement.

5) System

As part of the change management project, reliance on new technologies and system is increasing, and using of expert and decision making system, stronger controls can be in placed which would be asset to the learning organization.

5 0
2 years ago
Iris was at fault in a car crash in which Phil was injured. As they waited for the EMT's to arrive, a plane, which was part of a
kvv77 [185]

Answer:

superseding cause

Explanation:

According to my research on different liability law suits, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Iris will not be liable for this second set of injuries because the plane crash was a superseding cause. This refers to an accident that happens after another (initial accident) has already occurred in which an injury has happened. In this type of situation the person who caused the initial accident is not responsible for the second accident or injuries caused by it.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

7 0
2 years ago
Jeremy is studying the effects of income on the demand for Greek ceramics. If "ceteris paribus" is used, which factors would be
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

B) all factors affecting demand, except income

Explanation:

Ceteris paribus can be used to identify the relationship between two specific variables, while leaving all other factors constant. In this case, since Jeremy is studying the effects of income on the demand (of anything really, not only Greek ceramics), it should affect all factors affecting demand except income. Jeremy is going to analyze how the quantity demanded changes when the income changes, all other things constant.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • As jamal's income rises, his demand for pizza does not change. it follows that, for jamal, pizza is a(n)
    12·1 answer
  • Jon consulted with an accountant to prepare his tax return. He recommended the accountant to his friend saying that this year, t
    7·1 answer
  • Shawn went to a restaurant where the beer was mediocre and the place was run-down. The restaurant was out of many of its more po
    15·1 answer
  • On January 1st, Williams Company began the year with $200 worth of supplies, and during the year, purchased $800 worth of suppli
    6·1 answer
  • a. Tara buys only shoes and socks. When the price of shoes goes up, Tara continues buying exactly the same number of socks as be
    13·1 answer
  • Inventory depletion is a warning sign of: Impending inflation. A recessionary gap. Cyclical unemployment. Both a recessionary ga
    8·1 answer
  • Suppose that the weekly price of milk is $3.40 per gallon and MPEP decides to ramp up weekly advertising by 35 percent to $150 (
    15·1 answer
  • Consider a 11-period binomial model with R=1.02R=1.02, S_0 = 100S 0 ​ =100, u=1/d= 1.05u=1/d=1.05. Compute the value of a Europe
    9·1 answer
  • A first-rate SWOT analysis is a way to measure whether a company's value chain is longer or shorter than the chains of key rival
    10·1 answer
  • In 2007, Terry Inc. provided the following items in their footnotes. Their cost of goods sold was $22 billion under FIFO costing
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!