Answer: $67,600 and $2600
Explanation:
Total unit = 13,000
Defective unit cost = $5.20
Resale price = $3.00
Reworked = $5.00
Full price = $8.20
Opportunity cost
= Full price - replacement unit
= 8.20 - 5.20
= 3.00
= . Cost of reselling
= 13,000 × 3.00
= $39,000
1. Cost of defective units
= 13,000 × 5.20
= $67,600
2. Cost of reworked
= $5.00 × 13,000
= $65,000
3. Full price
= 13,000 × $8.20
= $106,600
B. Incremental income of selling the unit as scrap and reworked
Scarp = $67, 600
Reworked = $(106600 -39, 000- 65,000)
= $2600
Answer:
50,490 units
Explanation:
The computation of the number of units the company should produced is shown below:
= Expected sales units + ending inventory units - opening inventory units
where,
Opening inventory units is 1,350 units
Expected sales units is
= $27,000 + $27,000 × 60%
= $27,000 + $16,200
= 43,200 units
The ending inventory units is
= $43,200 × 20%
= 8,640 units
So, the units to be produced is
= 43,200 units + 8,640 units - 1,350 units
= 50,490 units
Answer:
By how much are customers paying early or late?
Explanation:
Days sales outstanding (DSO) represents the average number of many days it takes a business to collect its accounts receivables.
DSO = (accounts receivables / total credit sales) x 365 days
DSO = ($60,000 / $325,000) x 365 days = 67.38 days
customers are paying late by 67.38 days - 45 days = 22.38 days
Answer:
Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Began July with a finished-goods inventory = $48,000
Finished-goods inventory at the end of July = $56,000
Cost of goods sold during the month = $125,000
Cost of goods manufactured during July:
= Ending finished goods inventory + Cost of goods sold - Beginning finished goods inventory
= $56,000 + $125,000 - $48,000
= $133,000
Answer:
a. 1, 5 and 7
b. Resources will be allocated inefficiently
c. Differing sizes and capacities
d. Benefits due to economies of scale
e. Reduce prices and improve resource allocation.
Explanation:
The correct combination is 1, 5 and 7. The price of a pure monopoly firm is much higher than that of purely competitive firm because the later is a price taker while the former is a price fixer. Because of this, output of monopoly is lower while the profit margin is higher than that of competitive firm.
Assuming that a pure monopolist and a purely competitive firm have the same unit costs. In the case of a pure monopolist, resources will be allocated inefficiently because the monopolist does not produce at the point of minimum Average Total Cost and does not equate price and Marginal cost.
Even though both monopolists and competitive firms follow the MC = MR rule in maximizing profits, there are differences in the economic outcomes because pure competitors lack capacity and are smaller in size while the monopolist has the capacity to expand inorder to maximize profits.
The costs of a purely competitive firm and a monopoly may be different because the monopolist is capable of taking advantage of cost reduction arising from economics of scale. Pure competitors does not experience economies of scale due to their small sizes.
If a monopoly can experience economies of scale, it can reduce prices beyond that of the pure competitor thereby ensuring a more efficient resource allocation.
